|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]张茂泽.孔子的人性论[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2013,15(02):71-76.
　ZHANG Mao-ze.Confucius's theory of human nature[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2013,15(02):71-76.
点击复制

孔子的人性论(PDF)
分享到：

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第15卷
期数:
2013年02期
页码:
71-76
栏目:
哲学
出版日期:
2013-06-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Confucius's theory of human nature
作者:
张茂泽
西北大学 中国思想文化研究所,陕西 西安 710069
Author(s):
ZHANG Mao-ze
Institute of Chinese Thought and Culture, Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, Shaanxi, China
关键词:
孔子;  人性;  实质的人性论
Keywords:
Confucius;  human nature;  actual human nature theory
分类号:
B222.2
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
学人论孔子人性思想,多以“性相近也,习相远也”一句作为代表。其实,根据孔子实质的人性论,他的人性思想远比这丰富、深刻而系统。孔子将人纳入理性考察范围,结合文明史情况,将观察他人、反思自我两种方法结合起来,发现人性的主要内涵是以“仁”、“礼”等为中心的德性,性近习远的现实人性被要求围绕这一中心而变化,从而确立其在人性内涵中的真正地位; 他认定、推重的人性是人性中善的内涵,要求人们通过学习、克己等修养,化不良的现实人性为善的人性。所以,孔子的人性论是倾向于人性善说的; 这成为后儒所谓“孔孟之道”的人性论基础。孔子的人性论,还存在着可以和马克思人性论相沟通的内容,可以作为中国古代思想文化的代表,为人类普世价值建设提供积极的思想资源。
Abstract:
When scholars talk about Confucius's idea about human nature, “Their natures are much the same and their habits become widely different“ is supposed to be the typical reflection of his idea. In fact, according to his theory of human nature, his idea is richer, profound and systematic. Confucius investigated human beings in a rational way. Based on the history of civilization, he combined investigation of others with self-examination and found that the main connotation of human nature was kindheartedness and courtesy. Actual human nature of the same natures and different habits was supposed to vary around this connotation so as to be central part of human nature. He believed in the kindness of human nature and asked people to learn and restrain their selfishness so as to transform the not so good actual human nature into kind nature. Therefore, Confucius's theory of human nature tends to the theory of kind nature, which is the basis of the human nature theory of the doctrine of Confucius and Mencius. Confucius's theory of human nature is consistent with Marx's theory of human nature, which can be the representative of Chinese ancient ideology and culture and provide positive ideology resources for the construction of universal values.

参考文献/References:

[1] 孙叔平.中国哲学史稿:上[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1980.
[2]李存山.中国传统哲学纲要[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2008.
[3]陈荣捷.王阳明与禅[M].台北:台湾学生书局,1984.
[4]傅斯年.性命古训辨证[C]//刘梦溪.中国现代学术经典:傅斯年卷.石家庄:河北教育出版社,1996:135.
[5]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集:第3卷[M].中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,译.北京:人民出版社,1960.
[6]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集:第1卷[M].中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,译.北京:人民出版社,1956.

相似文献/References:

[1]罗 恰.由《说苑》引《诗》和上博简《孔子诗论》 再看孔子诗学[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2011,13(03):78.
　LUO Qia.Reanalysis Confucian poetics from the poems in Shuo Yuan and Confucius' Comment on the Book of Songs[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2011,13(02):78.
[2]范 婷.孔子“学”与“思”视阈下的素质教育[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2009,11(03):110.
　FAN Ting.Quality education with Confucian concept of “Learning” and “Thinking”[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2009,11(02):110.
[3]赵清文.林慎思的人性论及其教化意义[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2008,10(02):100.
　ZHAO Qing-wen.Theory of human nature of Lin Shen-si and its value for moral education[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2008,10(02):100.
[4]张彧,陆卫明.《论语》中的隐性德育智慧探析[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2016,18(01):102.
　ZHANG Yu,LU Wei-ming.Analysis of the implicit moral wisdom in the Analects of Confucius[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2016,18(02):102.
[5]彭砺志.孔子艺术哲学的悖论及和解[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(01):81.
　PENG Li-zhi.Paradox and reconciliation of Confucius’s philosophy of art[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):81.
[6]潘小慧.“安”可否作为儒家伦理实践的判准？——从“女安则为之”谈起[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):7.
　Pan Xiaohui.Can “Feeling at ease” be regarded as Confucian ethical practice?——from the perspective of “doing it with feeling at ease”[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(02):7.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2013-04-05 作者简介:张茂泽(1965-),男,四川广安人,教授。
更新日期/Last Update: 2013-06-20