|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]田建荣.张载科举观及对关中士人教育观念的影响[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2013,15(01):8-12.
　TIAN Jian-rong.ZHANG Zai's views on the imperial examination and their influence on the Guanzhong scholars' educational concept[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2013,15(01):8-12.
点击复制

张载科举观及对关中士人教育观念的影响(PDF)
分享到：

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第15卷
期数:
2013年01期
页码:
8-12
栏目:
长安学研究暨黄帝文化会议专题
出版日期:
2013-03-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
ZHANG Zai's views on the imperial examination and their influence on the Guanzhong scholars' educational concept
作者:
田建荣
陕西师范大学 教育学院,陕西 西安 710062
Author(s):
TIAN Jian-rong
School of Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710062, Shaanxi, China
关键词:
张载;  科举观;  关中士人;  教育观念
Keywords:
ZHANG Zai;  view on imperial examination;  scholar of Guanzhong;  educational concept
分类号:
B244.4
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
在文献分析的基础上,对张载的生平实践进行研究,着重探讨其科举观以及对关中士人教育观念的影响。研究认为,“孰能少置意科举,相从于尧舜之域否?”是张载关于科举态度和举士观点的集中阐述; 张载这种反对以应举为目的和片面追求科第功名的考试思想,不仅对当时关中士人教育观念的形成和发展产生了重要影响,至今也有很强的现实启发意义。
Abstract:
Based on documental analysis, ZHANG Zai's whole life practice, especially his views on the imperial examination and their influence on Guanzhong scholars' educational concept was studied. The analysis indicates that “Be less infatuated with imperial examinations and work hard to learn to become a saint” demonstrates ZHANG Zai's attitude towards the imperial examination and his view on the selection of government officials. Not only did ZHANG Zai's opposition against taking examinations merely for the government position and in blind pursuit of fame have an important influence on the formation and development of the Guanzhong scholars' educational concept at that time, but it also is of great enlightening significance for the modern Chinese society.

参考文献/References:

[1] 张 载.张载集[M].北京:中华书局,1978.
[2]张世敏.张载年谱[EB/OL].(2002-11-20)
[2012-09-15].http://www.confucius2000.com/zhangzaici/zzainianpu.htm.
[3]韦 维.传衍关学的吕大临[J].理论学刊,1987(4):48.
[4]咸阳市地方志编纂委员会.咸阳市志[M].西安:三秦出版社,2000.
[5]向 盱.中兴关学的吕柟[J].理论学刊,1987(10):48.
[6]董敬畏.关学理念与地域文化:以关中邓村为例[J].文化学刊,2011(3):78-87.
[7]龚 杰.张载评传[M].南京:南京大学出版社,1996.
[8]李泽骘.张载实学的历史定位[J].宝鸡文理学院学报:社会科学版,2000(3):1-5.
[9]曾枣庄.文星璀璨:北宋嘉祐二年贡举考论[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2010.
[10]宣朝庆.大家精要:张载[M].昆明:云南教育出版社,2011.
[11]黄宗羲,全祖望.宋元学案[M].北京:中华书局,1986.
[12]王守仁.王阳明全集[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1992.
[13]刘学智.冯从吾与关学学风[J].中国哲学史,2002(3):73-79.
[14]李钟善,陈敏钰.陕西历代教育家评传[M].西安:陕西人民教育出版社,1994.
[15]杨学为.中国考试大辞典[M].上海:上海辞书出版社,2006.
[16]陈俊民.张载哲学思想及关学学派[M].北京:人民出版社,1986.

相似文献/References:

[1]李刚.张载经典阅读的方法论[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2013,15(04):7.
　LI Gang.Methodology of ZHANG Zai's classics reading[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2013,15(01):7.
[2]罗高强.张载哲学中的几个重要概念[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2010,12(04):55.
　LUO Gao-qiang.Some important concepts in ZHANG Zai's philosophy[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2010,12(01):55.
[3]林乐昌.张载“天人合一”思想及其特色[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2016,18(03):38.
　Lin Le-chang.ZHANG Zais thought of “oneness of man and nature” and its characteristics[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2016,18(01):38.
[4]樊小贤.张载哲学中的生态智慧探析[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2007,9(01):66.
　FAN Xiao-xian.Analysis of Zhang Zais ecological philosophy[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2007,9(01):66.
[5]孔令华.关学宗师张载的教育思想[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2007,9(02):57.
　KONG Ling-hua.Educational theory of Zhang Zai[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2007,9(01):57.
[6]刘泉.张载“心解”诠释学的理论特质[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(01):15.
　LIU Quan.Purpose and principle of ZHANG Zai’s “heart hermeneutics”[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(01):15.
[7]赵均强,贾俊侠.范式突破：张载对理学的开创之功[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2020,22(03):88.
　ZHAO Junqiang,JIA Junxia.Breaking the paradigm: discussion on ZHANG Zai’s pioneering work on neo-Confucianism[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2020,22(01):88.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2012-12-05 基金项目:陕西省社会科学基金项目(11N016) 作者简介:田建荣(1964-),男,陕西彬县人,教授,博士研究生导师。
更新日期/Last Update: 2013-03-20