|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]郑元叶,闵 军.对罗尔斯差异原则的批判 ——以历史唯物主义的社会正义观为视角[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2012,14(03):96-100.
　ZHENG Yuan-ye,MIN Jun.Critique of Rawl's difference principle —from the perspective of the social justice concept of Historical Materialism[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2012,14(03):96-100.
点击复制

对罗尔斯差异原则的批判 ——以历史唯物主义的社会正义观为视角(PDF)
分享到：

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第14卷
期数:
2012年03期
页码:
96-100
栏目:
哲学
出版日期:
2012-09-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Critique of Rawl's difference principle —from the perspective of the social justice concept of Historical Materialism
作者:
郑元叶1; 闵 军2
1. 福建师范大学福清分校 经济法律系,福建 福清 350300; 2. 长安大学 政治与行政学院,陕西 西安 710064
Author(s):
ZHENG Yuan-ye1;  MIN Jun2
1. Department of Economy and Laws, Fuqing Branch of Fujian Normal University, Fuqing 350300, Fujian, China; 2. School of Politics and Administration, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, Shaanxi, China
关键词:
历史唯物主义;  罗尔斯;  劳动过程自由;  差异原则
Keywords:
Historical Materialism;  Rawls;  the freedom of labor process;  difference principle
分类号:
B03
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为探究罗尔斯差异原则的主要内涵,对其所主张的自由和权利观点进行剖析。分析认为:差异原则仅仅着重劳动产品的分配,并不考虑劳动生产过程的自由和民主; 他对基本权利进行区分,进而把对生产资料的权利作为非基本权利,这在主张人类的自由和尊严首先要扎根于人类劳动生产活动之中的历史唯物主义看来,它丧失了作为指导人类最基本的劳动生产实践的规范价值; 差异原则作为一种正义观在实践上仍然是形式的,而不是实质的。
Abstract:
In order to explore the main implications of Rawls' difference principle, the paper ana-lyzes its freedom and rights. The analysis finds that the principle takes the distribution of labor product into account, but not the freedom and democracy of the labor process. Rawls distinguished the basic rights and took the right of means of production as a non-basic right. From the perspective of the Historical Materialism, the freedom and dignity should take root in the act of material production, but the theory lost its practical value from most basic labor production practice of human being. So, Rawls' difference theory was, in fact, not a virtual but a form justice in practice.

参考文献/References:

[1] Mccarthy G E.Marx and the ancients:classical ethics,social justice,and nineteenth-century political economy[M].New York:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc,1990.
[2]Rawls J.A theory of justice[M].Boston:The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press,1971.
[3]Buchanan A E.Marx and justice:the radical critique of liberalism[M].Totwa:Rowan & Allanheld Publishers Inc,1982.
[4]罗尔斯.作为公平的正义:正义新论[M].姚大志,译.上海:上海三联书店,2002.
[5]Arnold N S.Marx's radical critique of capitalist society:a reconstruction and critical evaluation[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1990.
[6]马克思.资本论:第3卷[M].中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,译.北京:人民出版社,1975.
[7]迈克尔·J·桑德尔.自由主义与正义的局限[M].万俊人,唐文明,张之锋,等,译.南京:译林出版社,2001.
[8]Peffer R G.Marxism,morality,and social justice[M].Princeton:Princeton University Press,1990.
[9]Brenkert G G.Marx's Ethics of Freedom[M].London:Routledge & Kegan Paul,1983.
[10]乔森纳·沃尔夫.政治哲学导论[M].王 涛, 赵荣华,陈任博,等,译.长春:吉林出版集团有限责任公司,2009.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘英.生态学马克思主义对历史唯物主义自然观的辩护[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(01):65.
　LIU Ying.Ecology Marxism’s defense on historical materialism view of nature[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(03):65.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2012-06-08 基金项目:福建省社会科学规划项目(2012B155) 作者简介:郑元叶(1971-),男,福建仙游人,哲学博士。
更新日期/Last Update: 2012-09-20