|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]梁 枢.《庄子·应帝王》新论[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2012,14(03):91-95，112.
　LIANG Shu.SHI Rong; poem annotation; technique of literary quotation; poem criticism[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2012,14(03):91-95，112.
点击复制

《庄子·应帝王》新论(PDF)
分享到：

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第14卷
期数:
2012年03期
页码:
91-95，112
栏目:
哲学
出版日期:
2012-09-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
SHI Rong; poem annotation; technique of literary quotation; poem criticism
作者:
梁 枢
定西师范高等专科学校 中文系,甘肃 定西 743000
Author(s):
LIANG Shu
Department of Literature, Dingxi Normal College, Dingxi 743000, Gansu, China
关键词:
双行一体;  四破;  一体多元;  牺牲
Keywords:
one body with double movement;  four abolishing;  one body with multi-phase;  sacrifice
分类号:
B223.5
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
从东西文化的视角对《庄子·应帝王》做了全新的且具有当代意识的阐释。分析认为:人类的主体生命和客体的绝对本体的“道”(帝王),原本就是处于双行一体的深度契合中; 只要能自觉破除或超越人类自我造作的种种观念的障蔽,则宇宙和人类演化历史的“一体多元”本相与现象的运动,也就是“浑沌”和凿“浑沌”双行一体,双向逆反的演化密义会自显,“浑沌”和凿“浑沌”是牺牲与复活同在的密义也会自显,这些观点具有创新性和领先性。
Abstract:
This paper, from the perspective of east and west cultuves, offers new interpretation of Zhuangzi and the response to emperor with modern sense. The analysis shows that the human principal life and the absolute subject “emperor” are actually the deep agreement of the two. If the self-made ideas of supper human can be got rid of, the “one body with multi-phase” implication of universe and human evolution can be shown, and the implication of “chaos breeding and chaos elimination” in their sacrifice and resurrection can also be shown. These findings are more creative and advanced.

参考文献/References:

[1] 郭庆藩.庄子集释[M].北京:中华书局,1982.
[2]崔大华.庄子岐解[M].郑州:中州古籍出版社,1988.
[3]张宝胜.薄伽梵歌[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1991.
[4]老 子.朱子集成[M].北京:中华书局,2006.
[5]朱 熹.四书集注[M].北京:中华书局,1983.
[6]蔡 沈.书经集传[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1997.
[7]中国基督教协会.新旧约全书[M].南京:爱德印刷有限公司,1994.
[8]李政道.对称与不对称[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2000.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2012-04-12 作者简介:梁 枢(1956-),男,甘肃定西人,副教授。
更新日期/Last Update: 2012-09-20