|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]罗 恰.由《说苑》引《诗》和上博简《孔子诗论》 再看孔子诗学[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2011,13(03):78-84.
 LUO Qia.Reanalysis Confucian poetics from the poems in Shuo Yuan and Confucius' Comment on the Book of Songs[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition),2011,13(03):78-84.
点击复制

由《说苑》引《诗》和上博简《孔子诗论》 再看孔子诗学(PDF)
分享到:

《长安大学学报(社科版)》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第13卷
期数:
2011年03期
页码:
78-84
栏目:
文学
出版日期:
2011-09-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Reanalysis Confucian poetics from the poems in Shuo Yuan and Confucius' Comment on the Book of Songs
作者:
罗 恰
安徽大学 历史系,安徽 合肥 230039
Author(s):
LUO Qia
Department of History, Anhui University, Hefei 230039, Anhui, China
关键词:
孔子 《说苑》 《诗》 《孔子诗论》
Keywords:
Confncius Shuo Yuan the Book of Songs' target="_blank" rel="external"> Confucius' Comment on the Book of Songs
分类号:
B222.2; I222.2
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了重新认识孔子诗学理论,将出土文献上博简《孔子诗论》与传世文献《说苑》对比分析。分析认为,《说苑》引《诗》内容与传统理解中的孔子诗学理论相和,而从上博简《孔子诗论》中可以看出,孔子对诗的解读虽然有其实用性、功利性的一面,但更重要的是从诗本身的意旨出发,揭示诗的文学艺术特质和诗人自身的情感抒发。从《孔子诗论》到《说苑》引《诗》,诗的教育功能与诗的艺术功能并重发展为偏重于对诗的教育功能阐发,对《诗》解释路径的发展趋势是清晰的。
Abstract:
In order to make a new understanding of Confucian poetics, the author carries out a comparative study between unearthed literature Confucius' Comment on the Book of Songs and handed down resource of Shuo Yuan, arrives at the conclusion that, the content of Shuo Yuan from the Book of Songs is consistent with traditional theories of Confucius poems. However, from Confucius' Comment on the Book of Songs, his understanding of poems had practicability, utilitarianism side, and more important is that his interpretation was from poetry itself to reveal artistic characteristics of poetry and poets own feelings from Confucius' Comment on the Book of Songs to Shuo Yuan's introduction from the Book of Songs, educational function and the artistic value were equally emphasized on poems, particularly on the educational function. And the way to explain its development trend of the Book of Songs is clear.

参考文献/References:

[1] 谢明仁.《说苑》引《诗经》考[C]//中国《诗经》学会.第四届《诗经》国际学术研讨会论文集.北京:学苑出版社,2000:322-324.
[2]吴闿生.诗义会通[M].北京:中华书局,1959.
[3]马承源.上海博物馆藏战国楚竹书[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2001.
[4]雒启坤.《诗经》散论[M].北京:商务印书馆,2002.
[5]傅道彬.孔子诗论与春秋时代的用诗风气[J].文艺研究,2002,27(2):39-45.
[6]梁道礼.孔子诗学的现象学还原[J].陕西师范大学学报:哲学社会科学版,1998,52(1):11-18.
[7]申红义.上博简《孔子诗论》的实用主义理论特色[J].中州学刊,2006,33(4):195-196.
[8]顾颉刚.诗经在春秋战国间的地位[M].石家庄:河北教育出版社,1996.
[9]杨伯峻.春秋左传注[M].北京:中华书局,1981.
[10]朱 熹.诗集传[M].北京:中华书局,1958.
[11]胡平生.读上博藏战国楚竹书《诗论》札记[C]//上海大学古代文明研究中心,清华大学思想文化研究所.上博馆藏战国楚竹书研究.上海:上海书店出版社,2002:15-16.
[12]陈 奂.诗毛氏传疏[M].台北:广文书局,1956.
[14]黄德宽,徐在国.《上海博物馆藏战国楚竹书(一)·孔子诗论》释文补正[J].安徽大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2002,52(2):3-15.
[15]饶宗颐.竹书《诗序》小笺:[EB/OL].(2002-09-12)
[2010-11-25].http://www.jianbo.org/Wssf /2002/raozon gyi01.htm.
[16]姜广辉.中国哲学第24辑经学今诠三编[M].沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,2002.
[17]刘信芳.孔子诗论述学[M].合肥:安徽大学出版社,2003.
[18]彭 林.《诗序》、《诗论》辨[M].上海:上海书店出版社,2002.
[19]萧 兵.孔子诗论的文化推绎[M].武汉:湖北人民出版社,2006.

相似文献/References:

[1]张茂泽.孔子的人性论[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2013,15(02):71.
 ZHANG Mao-ze.Confucius's theory of human nature[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition),2013,15(03):71.
[2]范 婷.孔子“学”与“思”视阈下的素质教育[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2009,11(03):110.
 FAN Ting.Quality education with Confucian concept of “Learning” and “Thinking”[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition),2009,11(03):110.
[3]张彧,陆卫明.《论语》中的隐性德育智慧探析[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2016,18(01):102.
 ZHANG Yu,LU Wei-ming.Analysis of the implicit moral wisdom in the Analects of Confucius[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition),2016,18(03):102.
[4]彭砺志.孔子艺术哲学的悖论及和解[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(01):81.
 PENG Li-zhi.Paradox and reconciliation of Confucius’s philosophy of art[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(03):81.
[5]潘小慧.“安”可否作为儒家伦理实践的判准?——从“女安则为之”谈起[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2017,19(02):7.
 Pan Xiaohui.Can “Feeling at ease” be regarded as Confucian ethical practice?——from the perspective of “doing it with feeling at ease”[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition),2017,19(03):7.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2011-03-03 基金项目:安徽大学研究生学术创新研究项目(YFC090077) 作者简介:罗 恰(1986-),男,湖北应城人,历史学硕士研究生。
更新日期/Last Update: 2011-09-20