|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]孙乃龙.古希腊辩证法的分化及其后果[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2009,11(02):76-81.
　SUN Nai-long.Differentiation of the ancient Greek dialectics and result[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2009,11(02):76-81.
点击复制

古希腊辩证法的分化及其后果(PDF)
分享到：

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

卷:
第11卷
期数:
2009年02期
页码:
76-81
栏目:
哲学
出版日期:
2009-06-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Differentiation of the ancient Greek dialectics and result
作者:
孙乃龙
南开大学 哲学系,天津 300071
Author(s):
SUN Nai-long
Department of Philosophy, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
关键词:
古希腊辩证法;  本体;  苏格拉底路向;  柏拉图路向;  实践辩证法
Keywords:
ancient Greek dialectics;  ontology;  road to dialectics of Socrates;  road to dialectics of Plato;  practice dialectics
分类号:
B502.21
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为探究辩证法的缘起和本真意蕴,运用逻辑分析的方法回归古希腊,分析古希腊辩证法的产生和逻辑演进过程。分析表明:源于古希腊的辩证法是在追寻世界的本源问题时产生的,具有本体论的意蕴; 它在经历了苏格拉底和柏拉图的完善之后产生了分化,形成了苏格拉底辩证法路向和柏拉图辩证法路向,且二者都面临着在解决“一与多关系”问题上的困境; 此后黑格尔继承了柏拉图的路向在思辨领域解决柏拉图的困境,而马克思在出发点上继承了苏格拉底辩证法的路向,并在本体论问题上扬弃了经黑格尔完善的柏拉图辩证法的路向,创立了实践辩证法。
Abstract:
The paper use the logic of regression analysis in ancient Greece to explore the origins of dialectics and the true meaning. By analyzing the emergence of ancient Greek dialectics and logical evolution, it is known that:the dialectics which is from ancient Greece came from the origin of the world. It is due to the ontology of the world that explores entanglement, and have the implication of ontology. However, the dialectics have a differentiation after Socrates and Plato perfected it:road to the dialectics of Socrates and road to the dialectics of Plato. They face a common dilemma in the relationship between General and the individual. Hegel inherited the road to the dialectics of Plato and tried to settle the plight of Plato in the thinking field while Marx inherited Socrates on the starting point, and abandoned the road to the dialectics of Plato which Hegel had perfected. In this situation, Marx created the practice dialectics.

参考文献/References:

[1] 色诺芬.回忆苏格拉底[M].吴永泉,译.北京:商务印书馆,2004.
[2]列 宁.列宁全集:第38卷[M].中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,译.北京:人民出版社,1986.
[3]北京大学哲学系外国哲学史教研室.西方哲学原著选读:上卷[M].北京:商务印书馆,2004.
[4]柏拉图.国家篇[M].郭斌和,张竹明,译.北京:商务印书馆,1986.
[5]黑格尔.哲学史讲演录:第2卷[M].贺 麟,王太庆,译.北京:商务印书馆,1997.
[6]赵敦华.西方哲学简史[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2004.
[7]柏拉图.柏拉图对话录[M].张秀章,解灵芝,译.长春:吉林人民出版社,2003.
[8]黑格尔.哲学史讲演录:第3卷[M].贺 麟,王太庆,译.北京:商务印书馆,1960.
[9]柏拉图.巴门尼德篇[M].陈 康,译.北京:商务印书馆,1982.
[10]黑格尔.逻辑学:上卷[M].杨一之,译.北京:商务印书馆,1979.
[11]黑格尔.历史哲学[M].王造时,译.北京:三联书店,1956.
[12]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集:第23卷[M].中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,译.北京:人民出版社,1972.
[13]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集:第1卷[M].中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,译.北京:人民出版社,1995.

相似文献/References:

[1]王红孝,杜瑜姣,景 慧,等.隐喻理解过程中的制约因素[J].长安大学学报(社科版),2009,11(03):101.
　WANG Hong-xiao,DU Yu-jiao,JING Hui,et al.Factors affecting understanding of metaphor[J].Journal of Chang＇an University(Social Science Edition),2009,11(02):101.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2009-01-04 作者简介:孙乃龙(1982-),男,山东东平人,哲学博士研究生。
更新日期/Last Update: 2009-06-20