|Table of Contents|

Exploration of high-quality transformation of resource-based economy from the perspective of the Chinese path to modernization(PDF)

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2022年06期
Page:
13-24
Research Field:
马克思主义理论研究
Publishing date:
2022-12-20

Info

Title:
Exploration of high-quality transformation of resource-based economy from the perspective of the Chinese path to modernization
Author(s):
LI Fanrong;  LV Siying
(School of Economics, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, Shanxi, China)
Keywords:
Chinese path to modernization;  resource-based economy;  high-quality development;  new development concept;  new development pattern;  carbon peak and carbon neutrality
PACS:
F124; F426
DOI:
-
Abstract:
China has embarked on a new journey toward building a modern socialist country in all respects, and high-quality development is the primary task toward building a modern socialist country in all respects. The high-quality transformation of resource-based economy is an important opportunity for China's high-quality economic development, regional coordinated development, and carbon peak and carbon neutrality efforts. In order to promote the high-quality transformation and development of resource-based economy, this paper explores the theoretical and practical difficulties faced by the transformation and development of resource-based economy at present, explains the practical logic of high-quality transformation of resource-based economy to promote the Chinese path to modernization, and puts forward the path of high-quality transformation of resource-based economy and the key points of policy implementation in the perspective of the Chinese path to modernization. This study believes that the high-quality transformation and development of resource-based economy is led by the green and low-carbon transformation of the economic system, industrial system and energy system. In the process of the transformation and upgrading of traditional resource-based industries and the cultivation and development of emerging industries, structural unemployment can be prevented and solved to promote the modernization of common prosperity. The green transformation and development of resource-based industries can promote the modernization of the harmonious coexistence of man and nature. Compared with the previous transformation and development of resource-based economy, the high-quality transformation of resource-based economy in the perspective of the Chinese path to modernization requires implementing the new development concept in depth and building a new development pattern to enhance the endogenous impetus of high-quality transformation and development of resource-based economy. Therefore, this paper argues that the high-quality transformation and development of resource-based economy can be effectively promoted by focusing on the policy implementation of multi-level intergovernmental coordination, paying attention to top-level design, cultivating transformation subjects, and reforming the performance appraisal system of local governments.

References:

[1] 赵璐,吕利娜.从锈带到先进制造业集群:资源型经济转型及高质量发展的路径探析[J].世界地理研究,2021,30(4):802-812.
[2]JEREMY M.Socio-economic foundations of the Russian post-Soviet regime:the resource-based economy and estate-based social structure of contemporary Russia[J].Europe-Asia studies,2018,70(7):1171-1172.
[3]AUTY R M.Sustaining development in mineral economies:the resource curse thesis[M].London and New York:Routledge,1993.
[4]MALINGA W.“From an agro-based to a mineral resources-dependent economy”:a critical review of the contribution of mineral resources to the economic development of Zimbabwe[J].Forum for development studies,2018,45(1):71-95.
[5]AROCA P.Impacts and development in local economies based on mining:the case of the Chilean II region[J].Resources policy,2001,27(2):119-134.
[6]FEOLA G.Capitalism in sustainability transitions research:time for a critical turn?[J].Environmental innovation and societal transitions,2020,35:241-250.
[7]BUSCHER B,ARSEL M.Introduction:neoliberal conservation,uneven geographical development and the dynamics of contemporary capitalism[J].Journal of economic and human geography,2012,103(2):129-135.
[8]REIS T N P.A policy analysis framework for green political economy[J].International journal of green economics,2015,9(3/4):330-353.
[9]SMITH T S J.Policy,polycentrism,and practice:governance imaginaries in sustainability transitions[J].Area,2020,52(1):187-195.
[10]WIECZOREK A J.Sustainability transitions in developing countries:major insights and their implications for research and policy[J].Environmental science and policy,2018,84:204-216.
[11]FEOLA G.Capitalism in sustainability transitions research:time for a critical turn?[J].Environmental innovation and societal transitions,2020,35:241-250.
[12]张复明,景普秋.资源型经济及其转型研究述评[J].中国社会科学,2006(6):78-87.
[13]张生玲,李跃,酒二科,等.路径依赖、市场进入与资源型城市转型[J].经济理论与经济管理,2016(2):14-27.
[14]郭丕斌,周喜君,李丹,等.煤炭资源型经济转型的困境与出路:基于能源技术创新视角的分析[J].中国软科学,2013(7):39-46.
[15]HAJER M,VERSTEEG W.Imagining the post-fossil city:why is it so difficult to think of new possible worlds?[J].Territory,politics,governance,2019,7(2):122-134.
[16]ANDREWS-SPEED P.Applying institutional theory to the low-carbon energy transition[J].Energy research & social science,2016,13:216-225.
[17]ERNST A,BIB K H,SHAMON H,et al.Benefits and challenges of participatory methods in qualitative energy scenario development[J].Technological forecasting & social change,2018,127:245-257.
[18]SOVACOOL B K,GEELS F W.Further reflections on the temporality of energy transitions:a response to critics[J].Energy research & social science,2016,22:232-237.
[19]杨俊青,陈虹,许艳红.传统产业转型与新兴产业培育发展中的就业问题研究——以山西省为例[J].中国人口科学,2018(5):2-16,126.
[20]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集(第五卷)[M].中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,编译.北京:人民出版社,2009.
[21]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集(第七卷)[M].中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,编译.北京:人民出版社,2009.
[22]中共中央党校(国家行政学院).习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想基本问题[M].北京:人民出版社,北京:中共中央党校出版社,2020.
[23]卢治达.碳金融对资源型产业低碳化的影响研究——基于CDM的实证研究[J].金融理论与实践,2020(11):57-62.
[24]赵富礼,张丽华.山西省金融支持煤炭行业科技创新发展研究[J].煤炭经济研究,2020,40(3):55-61.
[25]曾旗,崔磊磊.资源型地区人才资本对经济增长贡献率研究——基于12个省市对比分析[J].改革与开放,2019(7):17-21.
[26]国务院第七次全国人口普查领导小组办公室.2020年第七次全国人口普查主要数据[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2021.
[27]新华社.习近平在山西考察时强调 全面建成小康社会 乘势而上书写新时代中国特色社会主义新篇章[EB/OL].(2020-05-12)[2022-10-10].http://www.qstheory.cn/yaowen/2020-05/12/c_1125976117.htm.
[28]罗福周,王婷.城市收缩背景下基础设施与人口的协调发展研究——以东北地区30个收缩城市为例[J].国土资源科技管理,2021(4):114-127.
[29]景普秋.资源型区域矿-城-乡冲突及其协调发展研究[J].城市发展研究,2013,20(5):146-151.
[30]张艳,张雨,孙哲远.资源依赖、政府治理能力对资源型城市绿色经济转型的影响[J].南京财经大学学报,2022(2):76-85.
[31]李玲娥.现代化经济体系构建与资源型经济高质量发展[J].政治经济学评论,2022,13(5):59-86.
[32]习近平.习近平谈治国理政(第2卷)[M].北京:外文出版社,2017.
[33]李琼,余清霜.新发展阶段与新发展格局构建[J].福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2021(3):30-45.
[34]习近平.把握新发展阶段,贯彻新发展理念,构建新发展格局[J].奋斗,2021(9):4-18.
[35]黄群慧.推动需求侧管理与供给侧改革有效协同[N].经济日报,2021-05-12(6).
[36]RUGGIERO S,MARTISKAINEN M,ONKILA T.Understanding the scaling-up of community energy niches through strategic niche management theory:insights from Finland[J].Journal of cleaner production,2018,170:581-590.
[37]锁利铭,陈斌.地方政府合作中的意愿分配:概念、逻辑与测量——以泛珠三角为例[J].学术研究,2021(4):58-67.
[38]新华社.习近平主持中央政治局第十七次集体学习并讲话[EB/OL].(2019-09-24)[2022-10-10].http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-09/24/content_5432784.htm.
[39]侯林岐,张杰.多维政绩考核、地方政府竞争与城市生产效率损失[J].现代经济探讨,2020(1):19-28.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2022-12-20