|Table of Contents|

Empirical study on China's provincial cultural development and its influencing factors in external environment(PDF)

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2021年03期
Page:
56-65
Research Field:
经济与管理
Publishing date:
2021-07-20

Info

Title:
Empirical study on China's provincial cultural development and its influencing factors in external environment
Author(s):
SHANG Zijuan1; 2;  XUE Yunli1; 2;  HAO Yibo3
(1. School of Marxism, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, Shaanxi, China; 2. Think Tank of Shaanxi Cultural Development and Integration Innovation (Chang'an University), Xi'an 710064, Shaanxi, China; 3. School of Marxism,Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, Shaanxi, China)
Keywords:
cultural development;  provincial panel data;  Ordered Logistics;  strong cultural province;  cultural industry;  cultural program;  mass culture;  regional disparity
PACS:
G124
DOI:
-
Abstract:
In order to study the degree of influence of external environmental factors on the cultural development at the provincial level in China, this paper divides the cultural development at the provincial level into cultural industry factors and cultural program factors, uses the panel data from 31 provinces at the national macro level from 2015 to 2018, establishes the Ordered Logistics regression model on the influencing factors of cultural development, and studies the influence of five environmental factors including cultural policy environment, social cultural environment, human resource environment, social economic environment, and mass cultural environment on comprehensive cultural development, cultural industry factors and cultural program factors. This paper indicates that the five types of environmental factors all have a significant impact on comprehensive cultural development, in which the impact of mass cultural environment on cultural programs and that of economic environment on the cultural industry is more significant. Therefore, in the construction of a strong cultural province, the provincial government should pay more attention to regional disparities and adapt measures to local conditions, increase and strengthen the investment of cultural and human capital, create a sound cultural policy environment, guide cultural consumption and build a favorable mass culture atmosphere.

References:

[1] 袁海,吴振荣.中国省域文化产业效率测算及影响因素实证分析[J].软科学,2012,26(3):72-77.
[2]周正刚.文化事业与文化产业关系辨正[J].东岳论丛,2010,31(11):140-144.
[3]柳敏和,王春城.河北省文化强省建设的理论意蕴与政策构想[J].河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2009,32(4):143-146.
[4]河南省社会科学院课题组,焦锦淼,喻新安.文化强省内涵与指标体系研究[J].中州学刊,2008(1):55-63.
[5]“构建文化强省(市)指标评估体系研究”课题组,陈澍,孟东方,等.文化强省(市)指标体系:逻辑演进抑或多维评估[J].改革,2011(11):141-150.
[6]于泽,朱学义.文化强省评估指标体系研究[J].统计与决策,2014(5):28-30.
[7]刘玉堂,刘保昌.中西部文化强省的基本目标、内涵和指标体系[J].黄冈师范学院学报,2010,30(4):78-82.
[8]魏鹏举,戴俊骋.中国公共文化经济政策探析[J].中国行政管理,2016(12):100-104.
[9]付春.新农村公共文化服务体系建设及其基本思路[J].农村经济,2010(4):105-109.
[10]黄伟群.我国文化产业发展的主要影响因素实证分析[J].图书情报工作,2014,58(10):19-23.
[11]林秀梅,张亚丽.文化产业发展影响因素的区域差异研究——基于面板数据模型[J].当代经济研究,2014(5):42-46.
[12]Ritz A,Brewer G A.Does societal culture affect public service motivation? evidence of sub-national differences in Switzerland[J].International Public Management Journal,2013,16(2):224-251.
[13]王谓秋,任贵州.公共文化服务体系共建共享的社会动因与路径选择——基于文化治理的视角[J].图书馆理论与实践,2016(9):61-65.
[14]王长寿.陕西文化产业发展的契机与路径[J].长安大学学报(社会科学版),2017,19(4):9-16.
[15]顾江,吴建军,胡慧源.中国文化产业发展的区域特征与成因研究——基于第五次和第六次人口普查数据[J].经济地理,2013,33(7):89-95.
[16]王家庭,张容.我国文化产业发展影响因素及提升路径的区域分析[J].统计与决策,2010(2):79-81.
[17]罗能生,张希,肖丽丽.中国文化软实力影响因素实证研究[J].经济地理,2011,31(7):1146-1151.
[18]周锦,闻雯.基于因子分析的我国文化产业发展评价[J].华东经济管理,2012,26(2):46-50.
[19]Walsh C.Creating a competitive culture in the public service:the role of audits and other reviews[J].Australian Journal of Public Administration,2010,54(3):325-331.
[20]毛雁冰,韩玉.新常态下公共文化服务供给水平的实证分析[J].图书馆论坛,2015,35(12):32-38.
[21]李敏.文化人才队伍建设的分析与思考[J].江汉论坛,2010(9):136-139.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2021-07-20