|Table of Contents|

Problems and countermeasures in equity investment with rural collective land use rights(PDF)

《长安大学学报(社科版)》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2017年05期
Page:
91-97
Research Field:
经济与管理
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Problems and countermeasures in equity investment with rural collective land use rights
Author(s):
XU Tang-qi LI Chun-ying
School of Earth Science and Resources, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, Shaanxi,China
Keywords:
transfer of land rural collective land equity investment financial management land use rights lease equity investment with land use rights
PACS:
F301
DOI:
-
Abstract:
The purpose of this paper was to analyze the potential problems in equity investment with rural collective land use rights, focusing on the benefits and risks of rural households in the transfer of land, from the perspective of financial management. The literature synthesis method, inductive deduction method and mathematical model method were used in this study. We wanted to set up the goal for further research how to solve these problems and provide reference for the reform of rural land system and rural collective land transfer policy. It was found that under the current conditions, there were a lot of unavoidable problems, such as the assessment of land use rights, the distribution of benefits after the shareholding, and the liquidation of property at the time of company bankruptcy in equity investment with rural land use rights; we must gradually improve the external conditions and crack down the system constraints to solve the above problems by establishing a tangible market for land in rural areas, strengthening audit supervision of rural finance, reshaping rural collective economic organizations, and improving the rural democracy and legal system and the system of villagers’ autonomy. The results show that under the current conditions, there are a series of prominent problems that need to be resolved in equity investment with rural collective land use rights. If making this kind of system arrangement directly without changing external environment, it is not only unfavorable to protect the land rights and interests of farmers and cannot solve the problem of longterm livelihood for farmers, but also can cause more disputes of interest and bigger social contradictions; land use rights leasing has the characteristics of stable income and low risk, and rent income can be adjusted with the change of market price, which is more conductive to protect peasants’ rights and interests, and more in line with the peasants’ expectations. So land use rights leasing is better than equity investment with rural collective land use rights to farmers at present.

References:

-

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2018-01-04