|Table of Contents|

Theoretical formation of Heidegger’s physical view to media philosophy(PDF)

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2017年01期
Page:
99-105
Research Field:
文学艺术
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Theoretical formation of Heidegger’s physical view to media philosophy
Author(s):
Qiao Ji-qing
School of Literary Arts and Communication, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, Shaanxi, China
Keywords:
on the nature of things;  the material nature of things;  interness;  ontology;  media philosophy;  the object of zuhanden
PACS:
B516.54
DOI:
-
Abstract:
In order to study how the media enter the field of philosophy, this paper adopted traditional philosophy theory as a theoretical foundation for media philosophy. Through the discussion of Heidegger’s interness, the paper analyzed the position of the object with the characteristics of media from the perspective of interness, and determined the position of media in ontology. The research results show that Heidegger’s ontology mainly explores the existence nature of things and the possibility of pursuing the authentic self, and during this process the existence of things as interness is inevitably present. There are three aspects for the idea of the material nature of things. The first aspect is based on the ontology of existence of things. Object, as a kind of object of zuhanden for existence of things, plays a guiding and symbolic role. For its "interrelation" structure, it points out the interrelation between existence of things and object, and even the meaning of the whole world. The second aspect is based on its own existence structure. The state of “ordinary people” in the form of alienation constitutes the daily existence state of things, and in the form of “utensil” it constructs the existence of utensil’s state, which makes the existence of things in the state of gossip, curiousness and ambiguous degradation. The third aspect is based on the origin of the object. Objects, as the aggregation of heaven, earth, man and God needs to be achieved by art works. It means that the creation of objects is regarded as a kind of work to show its material nature. For example, poetry, as an essential art, makes object present itself as object in poetic dwelling. These three aspects constitute the three dimensions of media philosophy. These views on the nature of things play an important role in the media analysis from the perspective of ontology.

References:

［1］马歇尔?麦克卢汉，斯蒂芬妮?麦克卢汉，戴维?斯坦斯.麦克卢汉如是说：理解我［M］.何道宽，译.北京：中国人民大学出版社，2006. ［2］马歇尔?麦克卢汉.理解媒介——论人的延伸［M］.何道宽，译.北京：商务印书馆，2000. ［3］克里斯托夫?霍洛克斯.麦克卢汉与虚拟实在［M］.刘千立，译.刘钢，校.北京：北京大学出版社，2005. ［4］何道宽. 媒介即文化──麦克卢汉媒介理论批评［J］. 现代传播：北京广播学院学报，2000（6）：25-31. ［5］陈朝晖.媒介即信息：媒介研究的一种本体视角［J］.新闻传播，2013（2）：26-27. ［6］李凌凌，杨伯溆.媒介即信息——人类传播史解读［J］.当代传播，2002（4）：4-7. ［7］李岩.视觉传播中的技术理性批判——来自麦克卢汉“冷媒介”说的议题［J］.新闻与传播研究，2004（4）：34-40，95. ［8］梅琼林.透明的媒介：论麦克卢汉对媒介本质的现象学直观［J］.人文杂志，2008（5）：33-38. ［9］李曦珍.麦克卢汉“媒介即讯息”的认识论原理［J］.国外社会科学，2013（3）：54-63. ［10］何道宽.媒介革命与学习革命——麦克卢汉媒介理论批评［J］. 深圳大学学报：人文社会科学版，2000，7（5）：99-106. ［11］胡潇.麦克卢汉媒介哲学解析［J］.广州大学学报：社会科学版，2009，8（6）：14-18. ［12］范龙.“媒介即讯息”：麦克卢汉对媒介本质的现象学直观［J］.浙江大学学报：人文社会科学版，2008，38（2）：189-195. ［13］李岩.视觉传播中的技术理性批判——来自麦克卢汉“冷媒介”说的议题［J］.新闻与传播研究，2004（4）：34-40+95. ［14］仲霞.走向主体间性：海德格尔思想的发展历程［J］.云南师范大学学报：哲学社会科学版，2014，46（5）：89-95. ［15］赵卫国.海德格尔的时间性与时——间性问题研究［D］.上海：复旦大学，2003. ［16］海德格尔.存在与时间［M］.陈嘉映,王庆节,译.上海：上海三联书店，2006. ［17］海德格尔.路标［M］.孙周兴,译.北京：商务印书馆,2007. ［18］海德格尔.林中路［M］.孙周兴,译.上海：上海译文出版社，2006.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2017-03-07