|Table of Contents|

Problem and solution on the management of deposits for shared bicycle(PDF)

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2018年05期
Page:
24-31
Research Field:
交通运输
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Problem and solution on the management of deposits for shared bicycle
Author(s):
HONG Ping;  ZHANG Xiaya;  YU Shuaidong
Institute of Political Science and Law， Jiangxi Normal University， Nanchang 330022， Jiangxi， China
Keywords:
shared bicycle;  deposit management;  deposit custody system;  withdrawal of deposit risk reserve;  Xiaoming bicycle
PACS:
F572；F724.6
DOI:
-
Abstract:
Paying deposit for shared bicycles is an important financial behavior having big influence on consumers and the companies during the development of shared bicycle industry. For the healthy development of the shared economy， deposits for shared bicycles is granted quasipublic property. To regulate the operation of shared bicycle suppliers， management of deposits for shared bicycles should be strengthened. This paper analyzed the concept and legal property of deposits. Research shows that shared bicycle providers do not have a clear view of the legal property for the deposits， leading to confusion during management， failure to set up special management account according to government request， or even misappropriation of the deposits. Under the highly competitive market survival mechanism， the shared bicycle company faces bankruptcy， resulting in nonrefundable deposits and other problems. The Shared bicycle company may be accused of crimes such as fraudulent fundraising and illegally taking public deposits. Therefore， it is urgent to strengthen the management of shared bicycle deposits. A specialized deposit management department and proper monitoring mechanism should be determined on the basis of clarifying that the bicycle deposit is a special pledge. The ownership for fruits of shared bicycle deposit should be clearly defined. At the same time， a deposit custody system should be adopted， as well as the withdrawal of deposit risk reserve by proportion.

References:

［1］胡宇齐.“互联网+”别只顾玩资本游戏［EB/OL］.（2017-04-21）［2018-05-26］.http://news.cnfol.com/guandianpinglun/20170421/24627212.shtml.
［2］袁浩捷.共享单车押金法律问题与对策研究［D］.成都:四川师范大学，2018.
［3］翟业虎，刘田鑫：共享单车租赁的法律问题［J］.扬州大学学报：人文社会科学版，2017（4）：39-46.
［4］罗浩亮：金融的属性：共享单车“押金”治理模式研究［J］.甘肃金融，2017（11）：41-44.
［5］吴沐暄，程楠，李玲：从租金和押金看共享单车的公益性和经营性［J］.价格理论与实践，2017（5）：136-138.
［6］李涛.共享单车刑事法律风险评估［EB/OL］.（2017-07-05）［2018-05-26］.http://www.legaldaily.com.cn/fxjy/content/201707/05/content_7232881.htm.
［7］彭雨晨.共享单车押金及预付资金监管规则的反思与重构［J］.金融法苑，2018（1）：147-155.
［8］夏新竹.共享单车用户押金监管研究［D］.北京:中国政法大学，2018.
［9］邓大鸣，李子建.共享单车押金的性质及其监管问题探究［J］.西南交通大学学报：社会科学版，2017（4）:94-100.
［10］刘红霞，周琳，杰文津，等.共享单车押金潜在风险不容忽视［EB/OL］.（2017-03-28）［2018-05-26］.http://zqb.cyol.com/html/201703/28/nw.D110000zgqnb_20170328_503.htm.
［11］徐宏：共享单车“押金池”现象的刑法学评价［J］.法学，2017（12）：124-132.
［12］张志胜.共享单车经营者收取押金不构成非法吸收公众存款罪［EB/OL］.（2017-03-13）［2018-05-21］https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/25750842.
［13］钱玉文，吴炯.论共享单车押金的性质及其法律规制［J］.常州大学学报：社会科学版，2018（4）：1-13.
［14］刘田鑫.共享单车押金的法律问题和风险研究［D］.北京:首都经贸大学，2018.
［15］刘庆华.消费者吐槽进去容易出来扯拐共享单车巨量押金去哪儿了？［EB/O］.（2017-02-22）［2018-05-26］.https://www.toutiao.com/i6389758451739787778/.
［16］秦铮，王钦.分享经济演绎的三方协同机制:例证共享单车［J］.改革，2017（5）：124-134.
［17］郭鹏，林祥枝，黄艺，等.共享单车：互联网技术与公共服务中的协同治理［J］.公共管理学报，2017（3）：1-10.
［18］翁士洪.城市共享单车监管体制的整体性治理创新研究［J］.电子政务，2018（4）：21-31.
［19］唐珩，薛江华.共享单车公益诉讼首案宣判：小鸣单车须10日内提存未退还押金［EB/OL］.（2018-03-22）［2018-05-26］.http://sh.qihoo.com/pc/99ba9ee5c3a5d0300?refer_scene=so_1&sign=360_e39369d1.



 

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2018-11-14