|Table of Contents|

The logic and pathway to enhancing the modern public cultural service system (PDF)

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2024年06期
Page:
1-43
Research Field:
马克思主义理论研究
Publishing date:
2024-12-30

Info

Title:
The logic and pathway to enhancing the modern public cultural service system
Author(s):
JIN Dongchang1;  LIU Jieming1;  YANG Jiulong2;  WEI Dongzeng2;  LI Si3;  WANG Meng4; LI Tianzi5;  TIAN Wanying5;  LEI Yucui6;  JIANG Fei6
Keywords:
public cultural service system;  high-quality cultural resource;  deliver directly to the grassroots;  “public cultural services +”;  “culture +”;  digital empowerment;  rural public culture;  public cultural facilities;  social force
PACS:
G120; G249.27
DOI:
-
Abstract:
The foundation of improving the modern public cultural service system and enhancing the effectiveness of public cultural services lies at the grassroots level, with a primary focus on deepening supply-side reforms. Focusing on the strategy of building a culturally strong nation, the Third Plenary Session of the 20th CPC Central Committee proposed the task requirement of establishing a mechanism for delivering high-quality cultural resources directly to the grassroots, further clarifying the development direction and goals of China's public cultural service system in the new era. Applying a unified approach that integrates theoretical logic, practical logic, and historical logic in combination with typical case analysis methods, deeply understanding the intrinsic value, primary models, and practical characteristics of delivering high-quality cultural resources directly to the grassroots, while exploring and establishing scientific and reasonable pathways and mechanisms for such delivery, is an essential choice for comprehending and implementing the core policy principles of delivering high-quality cultural resources directly to the grassroots in the new era. The research argues that establishing such a mechanism is a policy response to the practical issues of unbalanced development and insufficient supply of high-quality public cultural products in China's public cultural services. It is an objective requirement for building a culturally strong nation. The study proposes that the precise delivery and balanced development of public cultural services at the grassroots level can be achieved by enhancing the system of public cultural facilities, innovating major cultural benefit programs, creating a public cultural digital platform accessible to all, improving the standard system and service norms for grassroots public cultural services, and stimulating grassroots cultural creativity. The participation of social forces in the provision of public cultural services is an objective trend. Various regions have organically incorporated social forces, explored their participation mechanisms and tailored local solutions, resulting in four key practice models: vertical supply, mobile supply, collaborative supply, and digital supply. Notable achievements have been made in the socialized operation of public cultural facilities and government purchases of public cultural services. However, there remains room for improvement and optimization in mechanisms for nurturing users of high-quality cultural resources, matching supply and demand, balancing coordination, digital empowerment, and grassroots innovation. With a focus on the diverse needs of the people for public cultural services, the mechanism of delivering high-quality cultural resources directly to the grassroots must go beyond a one-way supply of resources and induce a sense of gain in the people. It requires not only a scientific supply-side mechanism but also a strengthened supply-demand matching mechanism to enhance effectiveness. Collaborative efforts between the supply and demand sides are essential. Focusing on the modern public cultural service system's need for coordination of supply and demand in terms of quality, direct access, and grassroots focus, the development should be categorized and precisely advanced in alignment with the broader strategy of integrated urban and rural development. Social forces and capital should be organically incorporated into a collaborative supply model involving the government, society, and the market. This requires accurately identifying both common patterns and individual differences within the urban and rural grassroots public cultural service systems. In addition, tailored strategies should be formed to enhance the effectiveness of grassroots public cultural service systems, focusing on dimensions such as organization, projects, technology, mechanisms, and capabilities to establish a mechanism system of delivering high-quality cultural resources directly to the grassroots, while practical support and guarantee systems should be established in areas such as economic, institutional, intellectual, organizational, and technical support.

References:

[1] 中共中央关于进一步全面深化改革 推进中国式现代化的决定[N].人民日报,2024-07-22(1).
[2]习近平.高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜 为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[M].北京:人民出版社,2022.
[3]郑海鸥.加快建设社会主义文化强国[N].人民日报,2024-10-02(2).
[4]肖鹏,张文馨.走向“公共文化服务共同体”:广东公共文化服务体系的创新探索与经验推广[J].图书馆论坛,2024,44(3):11-19.
[5]金栋昌,李志峰,刘洁明.习近平文化思想领航公共文化服务体系现代化新征程[J].图书馆论坛,2023,43(12):105-115.
[6]王晨,王媛.文化资源学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2021.
[7]国家统计局.人民文化生活日益丰富 文化强国建设加力提速——新中国75年经济社会发展成就系列报告之二十一[EB/OL].(2024-09-24)[2024-11-15].https://www.gov.cn/lianbo/bumen/202409/content_6976124.htm.
[8]张诗奇.文旅部:我国文化资源的数字化步伐加快助力建设文化强国[EB/OL].(2023-12-14)[2024-11-15].https://www.sohu.com/a/744039615_162758.
[9]范周,郑元瑶.“十五五”时期我国公共文化服务体系发展趋势研判与对策思考[J].图书馆建设,2024(5):13-24.
[10]姜晓萍,康健.官僚式外包:政府购买公共服务中利益相关者的行动逻辑及其对绩效的影响[J].行政论坛,2019,26(4):63-68.
[11]李国新.摹画未来、指引方向、明确任务、促进发展——《“十四五”公共文化服务体系建设规划》 解读[J].图书馆论坛,2021(8):1-6.
[12]陈波.优化基层文化供给:价值锚定与实践向度[J].人民论坛,2024(22):94-98.
[13]李斯,张皓珏,陈一.我国新型公共文化空间发展现状与未来展望[J].图书情报知识,2024,41(4):6-13.
[14]李国新.进一步深化文化体制机制改革中的公共文化服务[J/OL].图书馆杂志,1-10[2024-11-15].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/31.1108.G2.20241031.1809.006.html.
[15]谭志红.广州以共同体理念推动公共文化高质量发展[EB/OL].(2023-07-27)[2024-10-15].https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_24006070.
[16]徐继宏,鲁方平.“浙里文化圈”:一站式文化链接,推动高品质文化服务“触手可及”[EB/OL].(2023-10-16)[2024-10-15].https://news.qq.com/rain/a/20231016A0884R00.
[17]彭翠楠,但唐静.市聘乡用 以钱养事 赤壁基层公共文化服务高质量发展案例入选全国典型[EB/OL].(2023-02-14)[2024-10-15].https://news.hubeidaily.net/pc/1101000.html.
[18]傅才武,李延婷.公共文化建设为什么不能强化供给侧财政投入方式:一个解释框架[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2020,37(2):50-64.
[19]王浩,姚雪青,强郁文,等.中国式现代化是物质文明和精神文明相协调的现代化[EB/OL].(2024-03-04)[2024-10-27].http://opinion.people.com.cn/n1/2024/0809/c223228-40295692.html.
[20]祖晨阳.公共文化服务体系的提升之道[J].人民论坛,2018(9):138-139.
[21]李国新,苗美娟,李斯,等.面向2035:建设中国特色世界一流公共图书馆体系[J].中国图书馆学报,2022,48(1):4-16.
[22]中华人民共和国文化和旅游部.2023年文化和旅游发展统计公报[EB/OL].(2024-08-30)[2024-10-17].https://zwgk.mct.gov.cn/zfxxgkml/tjxx/202408/t20240830_954981.html.
[23]林华,楚天舒.我国公共文化法律有效实施的思考——以《公共文化服务保障法》《公共图书馆法》为中心[J].中国图书馆学报,2019,45(4):12-28.
[24]谢颖.健全社会力量参与公共文化服务机制推动优质文化资源直达基层[N].人民政协报,2024-08-13(3).
[25]肖鹏,肖九.公共文化机构作为专业主体:负责任创新视域下政府购买公共文化服务的制度建设方向[J].图书馆建设,2022(1):112-120.
[26]李国新.以法律的力量推动公共文化服务高质量发展[J].图书馆建设,2021(2):6-10.
[27]李国新.关于加强农村公共文化服务建设的思考[J].中国图书馆学报,2019,45(4):4-11.
[28]吴理财.积极推进城乡公共文化服务均等化——基于20省80县(市、区)的问卷调查分析[J].湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014,38(4):21-27.
[29]肖鹏,淳靖.盘活基层、激活社会:公共文化设施所有权和使用权分置改革研究[J].图书馆建设,2024(5):51-59.
[30]李国新.公共图书馆专业化发展的挑战与变革[J].图书馆论坛,2023,43(12):9-14.
[31]张广钦.优质文化资源直达基层机制的结构、发展与保障[J/OL].图书馆杂志,1-14[2024-11-15].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/31.1108.g2.20241108.0931.002.html.
[32]李国新,李斯.现代公共文化服务体系实现跨越式发展[J].中国报道,2022(10):36-39.
[33]周娴.南京有家“零编制”公共图书馆[N].新华日报.2024-09-15(1).
[34]袁文慧.委托非政府组织管理社区文化设施的模式研究——以打浦桥社区文化活动中心为例[D].上海:上海交通大学,2012.
[35]马铁军,孙嘉睿.公共文化服务模式创新:烟台大剧院“三位一体”社会化运作模式研究[J].人文天下,2018(14):11-15.
[36]巩瑞滕.中国当代公共文化场馆委托运营模式研究[D].济南:山东大学,2023.
[37]习近平.论党的宣传思想工作[M].北京:中央文献出版社,2020.
[38]丁柏铨.满足人民日益增长的精神文化需求[J].当代传播,2022(6):1.
[39]钱兰岚,王建涛.服务“可及性”视角下的新时代公共文化服务体系建设路径研究[J].图书馆杂志,2022(3):41-47.
[40]张靖,尚洁.公共文化服务与文化产业对位协同发展的实践样态观察与理论模型初构[J].情报资料工作,2024(4):104-112.
[41]甘佩玄,梁心怡,陈雅.我国基层公共文化服务建设现状与优化策略研究[J].图书馆理论与实践,2024(6):61-66,73.
[42]刘红.乡村振兴背景下农村公共文化服务体系建设研究[J].社会科学战线,2022(3):255-259.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2024-12-30