|Table of Contents|

Agglomeration of producer services and the measurement method of technological sophistication of China’s manufacturing industry imports(PDF)

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2022年05期
Page:
38-54
Research Field:
国际经济与贸易
Publishing date:
2022-11-30

Info

Title:
Agglomeration of producer services and the measurement method of technological sophistication of China’s manufacturing industry imports
Author(s):
CHEN Xiaohua;  DENG He
(School of Economics and Management, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, China)
Keywords:
producer services;  industrial agglomeration;  technological sophistication;  manufacturing industry;  digital industry;  labor productivity
PACS:
F424
DOI:
-
Abstract:
In order to analyze the impact of the agglomeration of producer services resources on the technological sophistication of China’s manufacturing industry imports, a new measurement method for the technological sophistication of China’s provincial sub-industry imports was constructed based on the modified Schott similarity model. The results indicate the following points. First, the agglomeration of producer services is conducive to reduce the technological sophistication of manufacturing industry imports, which is a robust conclusion both in the multidimensional test and at the heterogeneous industry level. This mechanism not only helps to reduce the probability that China will become a follower and a captive of the global value chain, but also allows China to escape the dilemma of being “checked” by foreign multinationals with highly technologically sophisticated products. Second, the agglomeration of producer services contributes to the improvement of labor productivity and the high-quality development of manufacturing industry, while economic growth speed, tax burden and negative external shocks will not change this mechanism. Third, guiding the agglomeration of producer services is an important way to help China get rid of the “low-end lock-in” and technological catch-up trap. It forges technological and industrial strengths for manufacturing enterprises, thus reducing the technological sophistication of manufacturing industry imports.

References:

[1] 林毅夫.新结构经济学——重构发展经济学的框架[J].经济学(季刊),2011,10(1):1-32.
[2] 陈晓华,刘慧,张若洲.高技术复杂度中间品进口会加剧制造业中间品进口依赖吗?[J].统计研究,2021,38(4):16-29.
[3]陈晓华,刘慧,蒋丽.生产性服务资源环节偏好与中间品进口[J].财贸经济,2019(3):101-115.
[4]诸竹君,黄先海,余骁.进口中间品质量、自主创新与企业出口国内增加值率[J].中国工业经济,2018(8):118-136.
[5]许家云,毛其淋,胡鞍钢.中间品进口与企业出口产品质量升级:基于中国证据的研究[J].世界经济,2017,40(3):52-75.
[6]施炳展,张雅睿.贸易自由化与中国企业进口中间品质量升级[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2016,33(9):3-21.
[7]胡馨月,顾国达,宋学印.搜寻成本、互联网与中国进口贸易:优进还是广进[J].浙江社会科学,2021(5):12-22,155.
[8]KRUGMAN P R.Increasing returns and economic geography[J].Journal of political economy,1991,99(3):483-499.
[9]ELLISON G,GLAESER E L.Geographic concentration in U.S.manufacturing industries:a dartboard approach[J].Journal of political economy,1997,105(5):889-927.
[10]DURANTON G,OVERMAN H G.Testing for localization using micro-geographic data[J].Review of economic studies,2005,72(4):1077-1106.
[11]陈建军,陈怀锦.集聚的测度方法评述:基于前沿文献的研究[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社科版),2017,38(4):134-142.
[12]陈晓华,杨莹莹.生产性服务业集聚的研究回顾与评述[J].浙江理工大学学报(社会科学版),2019,42(6):591-602.
[13]陈建军,陈国亮,黄洁.新经济地理学视角下的生产性服务业集聚及其影响因素研究——来自中国222个城市的经验证据[J].管理世界,2009(4):83-95.
[14]武俊奎,姜惠敏,王桂新.城市规模扩张对碳排放的影响机制研究:基于产业集聚的视角[J].产经评论,2012,3(4):23-25.
[15]陈建军,陈国亮,黄洁.新经济地理学视角下的生产性服务业集聚及其影响因素研究——来自中国222个城市的经验证据[J].管理世界,2009(4):83-95.
[16]WU Y Z,FAN P L,YOU H Y.Spatial evolution of producer service sectors and its influencing factors in cities:a case study of Hangzhou,China[J].Sustainability,2018,10(4):1-23.
[17]陈国亮,陈建军.产业关联、空间地理与二三产业共同集聚——来自中国212个城市的经验考察[J].管理世界,2012(4):82-100.
[18]HUALLACHAIN B ,LESLIE T F.Producer services in the urban core and suburbs of Phoenix,Arizon[J].Urban studies,2007,44(8):1581-1601.
[19]陈建军,刘月,邹苗苗.产业协同集聚下的城市生产效率增进——基于融合创新与发展动力转换背景[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2016,46(3):150-163.
[20]于斌斌.生产性服务业集聚如何促进产业结构升级?——基于集聚外部性与城市规模约束的实证分析[J].经济社会体制比较,2019(2):30-43.
[21]盛丰.生产性服务业集聚与制造业升级:机制与经验——来自230个城市数据的空间计量分析[J].产业经济研究,2014(2):32-39,110.
[22]OTTAVIANO G I P,MARTIN P.Growth and agglomeration[J].International economic review,2001,42(4):947-968.
[23]关志雄.从美国市场看中国制造的实力:以信息技术产品为中心[J].国际经济评论,2002(8):7-8.
[24]HAUSMANN R,HWANG J,RODRIK D.What you export matters[J].Journal of economic growth,2005,12(1):1-25.
[25]RODRIK D.What’s so special about China’s exports?[J].China & world economy,2006(5):1-19.
[26]SCHOTT P K.The relative sophistication of Chinese exports[J].Economic policy,2008,53(1):6-49.
[27]陈晓华,黄先海,刘慧.中国出口技术结构演进的机理与实证研究[J].管理世界,2011(3):44-57.
[28]王永进,盛丹.基础设施如何提升了出口技术复杂度[J].经济研究,2010(7):53-64.
[29]顾国达,方园.金融发展对出口品国内技术含量提升效应的研究——基于产业层面的分析[J].经济学家,2012(9):62-70.
[30]XU B,LU J Y.Foreign direct investment,processing trade,and the sophistication of China’s exports[J].China economic review,2009(12):34-45.
[31]祝树金,戢璇,傅晓岚.出口品技术水平的决定性因素:来自跨国面板数据的证据[J].世界经济,2010(4):28-46.
[32]HAUSMANN R,RODRIK D.Economic development as self-discovery[J].Journal of development economics,2003,72(2):603-633.
[33]黄先海,陈晓华,刘慧.产业出口复杂度的测度及其动态演进机理——基于52个经济体1993—2006金属制品出口的实证研究[J].管理世界,2010(3):44-56.
[34]JARREAU J,PONCET S.What Chinese provinces export matter for their income and export performance[J].Journal of accounting & economics 17,2012,279-298.
[35]戴翔.中国制成品出口技术含量升级的经济效应——基于省际面板数据的实证分析[J].经济学家,2010(9):77-83.
[36]陈晓华,刘慧.出口技术复杂度演进加剧了就业性别歧视?——基于跨国动态面板数据的系统GMM估计[J].科学学研究,2015,33(4):549-560.
[37]戴翔,金碚.服务贸易进口技术含量与中国工业经济发展方式转变[J].管理世界,2013(9):21-31.
[38]祝树金,奉晓丽.我国进口贸易技术结构的变迁分析与国际比较:1985—2008[J].财贸经济,2011(8):87-93,137.
[39]雷红敏.我国进口技术复杂度的特点及其影响因素[D].天津:天津财经大学,2016.
[40]刘慧,彭榴静,陈晓华.生产性服务资源环节偏好与制造业出口品国内增加值率[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2020,37(3):86-104.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2022-11-30