|Table of Contents|

Three periods in Chunqiu Gongyangzhuan(PDF)

《长安大学学报(社科版)》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2013年04期
Page:
58-63
Research Field:
哲学
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Three periods in Chunqiu Gongyangzhuan
Author(s):
LI Jing12
1. Institute of Marxist Philosophy and Chinese Modernization, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, China; 2. School of Humanities, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, China
Keywords:
three periods law three legitimacies chunqiu Gongyangzhuan ZuoZhuan Guliangzhuan
PACS:
B222.2
DOI:
-
Abstract:
By reviewing the structure of the three periods anecdote in Gongyangzhuan and its interpretation by DONG Zhong-shu and HE Xiu, the study attempts to clarify the main idea of the three periods and return the three periods into the three legitimacies on the basis of the time and philosophical connotations to restore the original essence of the three periods. This restoration has two meanings: first, to clarify the main idea of the three periods and the relationship between period and legitimacy and reject the way to describe the history of in Chunqiu by only focusing on the three periods; second, with the combination of the idea of the three periods with that of the three legitimacies, the evolution sense has been decreased and the succession of the three legitimacies becomes prominent. Overall view of the three periods from the perspective of the three legitimacies is to rethink the idea of respecting the heaven's willing following the ancient examples in the technology era, which has an alerting effect on the modern thought which emphasizes the progress at present but ignores the succession between the present and the past.

References:

[1] 康有为.孟子微·礼运注·中庸注[M].北京:中华书局,1987.
[2]陈其泰.清代公羊学[M].北京:东方出版社,1997.
[3]康有为.康有为全集[M].姜义华,张荣华,校.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007.
[4]苏舆.春秋繁露义证[M].北京:中华书局,1992.
[5]朱熹.四书章句集注[M].北京:中华书局,1983.
[6]李学勤.春秋公羊传注疏[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1999.
[7]胡安国.春秋胡氏传[M].杭州:浙江古籍出版社,2010.
[8]段熙仲.春秋公羊学讲疏[M].南京:南京师范大学出版社,2002.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2013-12-20