|Table of Contents|

Merging and innovation of ancient sages politics and democratic politics(PDF)

《长安大学学报(社科版)》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2013年02期
Page:
95-99,104
Research Field:
法学
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Merging and innovation of ancient sages politics and democratic politics
Author(s):
XIE Yang-ju
Institute of Chinese Thought and Culture, Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, Shaanxi, China
Keywords:
sage politics democratic politics civilization clash merged politics
PACS:
D091.2
DOI:
-
Abstract:
In ancient China, there was sages politics and developed system for sages selection. With the spread of western cultures, Chinese traditional cultures have been facing a great challenge, especially in political culture. Due to the influence of cultural determinism and reductionism, there was a tendency to set sages politics against democratic politics. Dr. SUN Zhong-shan, who held rational and unbiased cultural attitude, claimed that China's political civilization was of advantage in the world and deserved to be cherished, inherited and carried forward. For a long time, Mr. SUN's point of view was not paid enough attention, let alone sober and systematic study. We were also not highly confident in our politics and culture. For sage politics and democratic politics, they have their own advantages and disadvantages. To analyze, compare and merge these two kinds of politics may lead to a better combination so as to produce a merged politics to help solve the clash of civilizations.

References:

[1] 白 钢.中国政治制度通史[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2011.
[2]侯外庐.中国思想通史:第5卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1957.
[3]房列曙.中国历史上的人才选拔制度[M].北京:人民出版社,2005.
[4]陈文新,赵伯陶.七史选举志校注[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2009.
[5]何怀宏.世袭社会:西周至春秋社会形态研究[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2011.
[6]何怀宏.选举社会:秦汉至晚清社会形态研究[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2011.
[7]赵汀阳.天下体系[M].南京:江苏教育出版社,2005.
[8]刘海峰.二十世纪科举研究论文选编[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2009.
[9]杨学为.中国考试通史[M].北京:首都师范大学出版社,2008.
[10]施路赫特.理性化与官僚化:对韦伯之研究与诠释[M].顾忠华,译.桂林:广西师大出版社,2004.
[11]塞缪尔·亨廷顿.文明的冲突与世界秩序的重建[M].张立平,译.北京:新华出版社,2003.
[12]帕特里克·邓利维,布伦登.国家理论:自由民主的政治学[M].欧阳景根,尹冬华,孙云竹,译.杭州:浙江人民出版社,2007.
[13]查尔斯·蒂利.民主[M].魏洪钟,译.上海:上海世纪出版集团,2009.
[14]乔万尼·萨托利.民主新论[M].冯克利,阎克文,译.上海:上海世纪出版集团,2009.
[15]菲利普·内莫.民主与城邦的衰落[M].张 竝,译.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2011.
[16]罗伯特·达尔.民主及其批评者[M].曹海军,佟德志,译.长春:吉林人民出版社,2011.
[17]罗伯特·达尔.多元主义民主的困境[M].周军华,译.长春:吉林人民出版社,2006.
[18]弗朗西斯·福山.历史的终结及最后之人[M].黄胜强,许铭原,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2008.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2013-06-20