|Table of Contents|

Logical history and reality history —comparative analysis of Popper and Kuhn scientific view(PDF)

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2013年02期
Page:
86-89
Research Field:
哲学
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Logical history and reality history —comparative analysis of Popper and Kuhn scientific view
Author(s):
HE Hong-juan
School of Material Science and Engineering, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710061, Shaanxi, China
Keywords:
Popper;  Kuhn;  falsfication;  paradigm
PACS:
N02
DOI:
-
Abstract:
About the scientific knowledge growth, Popper expands from static demonstration logic to dynamic discovery logic, but confines it within logic range. His science development schema is a pure and logic abstract shape. Which is a rational model of science development. This is an abstract self-expansion of reason of emotion for human beings, and Popper claims it's a process of cognition without subject. Kuhn's historical school proceeds from normal form and incommensurability key concept after getting involved thoroughly with history of science. Based on division of regular science and revolution science, it portrays and describes the true historical course of science development, returns the true appearance of science, logic history that is abstract is substituted by realistic history.

References:

[1] 佟 立.西方后现代主义哲学思潮研究[M].天津:天津人民出版社,2003.
[2]K.R.波珀.科学发现的逻辑[M].查汝强,邱仁宗,译.北京:科学出版社,1986.
[3]托马斯·库恩.科学革命的结构[M].金吾伦,胡新和,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2003.
[4]波普尔.猜想与反驳[M].傅季重,纪树立,周昌忠,等,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1986.
[5]Kuhn T.The structure of scientific revolution[M].Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,1962.
[6]波普尔.科学知识进化论[M].纪树立,译.北京:三联书店,1992.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2013-06-20