|Table of Contents|

Yangguanzhai village relics in Xi'an, the first source of Chinese civilization —comparison between archaeological findings in Chinese settlements at “three Mountains and one Lake”(PDF)

《长安大学学报(社科版)》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2012年04期
Page:
21-26
Research Field:
长安学研究暨黄帝文化会议专题
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Yangguanzhai village relics in Xi'an, the first source of Chinese civilization —comparison between archaeological findings in Chinese settlements at “three Mountains and one Lake”
Author(s):
HU Yi-cheng
Shaanxi Academy of Social Sciences, Xi'an 710065, Shaanxi, China
Keywords:
Xi'an Yangguanzhai village relics Niuhe ridge relics Long mountain civilization
PACS:
K092
DOI:
-
Abstract:
Under the basis of multisource of Chinese civilization, three Moutains(Hua mountain, Long mountain and Hong mountain)are all supposed to be the first sources of Chinese civilization. As the repersentative of Yangshao(Hua mountain)civilization, Yangguanzhai village relics, which is about 6 000~5 000 years ago and has not been unearthed completely, is proved to be the first source of Chinese civilization by unearthed Tao Zhu etc. Niuhe ridge relics(Hong mountain)at Liaoxi, which is of the same age as Yangguanzhai village relics, is of feminism and falls behind Yangguanzhai village relics. “Solid evidence and dictatorial authority” porposed by professor GU Da-shun is not reasonable. Although Long moutain civilization is gorgeous, it's age is not as long as the other two. So it is hard to suppose that Long mountain civilization is the source of Chinese civilization. Through the comparison between three mountains, Yangguanzhai village relics is more likely to be the source of Chinese civilization.

References:

[1] 杨雪梅.“中华文明探源工程”公布最新研究成果[N].中国社会科学报,2012-07-13(12).
[2]苏秉琦.中国文明起源新探[M].沈阳:辽宁人民出版社,2009.
[3]郭大顺.追寻五帝[M].沈阳:辽宁人民出版社,2010.
[4]李学勤.李学勤讲中国文明[M].北京:东方出版社,2008.
[5]何炳棣.读史阅世六十年[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2009.
[6]石兴邦.“中华龙”的母体和原型是鱼[C]//胡义成.黄帝铸鼎郊雍考辩与赋象:西安古都史新探.西安:西安出版社,2011:105-111.
[7]张天恩.渭河流域仰韶文化聚落状况观察[C]//中国社会科学院考古研究所.中国聚落考古的理论与实践:第1辑.北京:科学出版社,2010:88-93.
[8]李伯谦.关于文明形成的判断标准问题[C]//中国社会科学院考古研究所.中国聚落考古的理论与实践:第1辑.北京:科学出版社,2010:81-87.
[9]张天恩.荆山铸鼎地周围新石器时代遗址与黄帝文化[C]//胡义成.黄帝铸鼎郊雍考辩与赋象:西安古都史新探.西安:西安出版社,2011:123-131.
[10]徐良高.中国民族文化源新探[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,1999.
[11]胡义成.西安是“黄帝故都”吗[N].中国社会科学报,2012-08-13(5A04).
[12]王炜林.陕西高陵杨官寨遗址考古报告[C]//胡义成.黄帝铸鼎郊雍考辩与赋象:西安古都史新探.西安:西安出版社,2011:12-19.
[13]胡义成.新探西安作为黄帝“铸铜(鼎)地”和“都邑”:兼论西安古都史达5000年[C]//胡义成.黄帝铸鼎郊雍考辩与赋象:西安古都史新探.西安:西安出版社,2011:190-234.
[14]中国社会科学院考古研究所,河南省文物考古研究所.灵宝西坡墓地[M].北京:文物出版社,2010.
[15]许顺湛.河南仰韶文化聚落研究[C]//中国社会科学院考古研究所.中国聚落考古的理论与实践:第1辑.北京:科学出版社,2010:182-198.
[16]李伯谦.文明探源与三代考古论集[M].北京:文物出版社,2011.
[17]索全星.郑州西山古城及其周边同时期遗址的考察[C]//中国社会科学院考古研究所.中国聚落考古的理论与实践:第1辑.北京:科学出版社,2010:172-188.
[18]郭沫若.释祖妣[C]//郭沫若.郭沫若全集·考古编:第1册.北京:科学出版社,1982:46-59.
[19]何炳武.黄帝祭祀研究[M].西安:陕西人民出版社,2009.
[20]许进雄.中国古代社会:文字与人类学的透视[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008.
[21]严文明.中国新石器时代文化的统一性和多样性[J].文物,1987(3):33-45.
[22]郭大顺.红山文化[M].北京:文物出版社,2005.
[23]王震中.从中原地区国家形态的演进看文明化进程[C]//江昌林.中国古代文明研究与学术史.石家庄:河北大学出版社,2006:88-94.
[24]何德亮.大汶口:龙山文化聚落形态的考察[C]//中国社会科学院考古研究所.中国聚落考古的理论与实践:第1辑.北京:科学出版社,2010:191-209.
[25]李玉洁.论中国古代文明的起源[C]//江昌林.中国古代文明研究与学术史.保定:河北大学出版社,2006:109-138.
[26]石兴邦.黄河流域原始社会考古研究上的若干问题[J].考古,1959(10):13-18.
[27]傅斯年.夷夏东西说[C]//国立中央研究院历史语言研究所.庆祝蔡元培先生六十五岁论文集.北京:国立中央研究院历史语言研究所,1935:111-123.
[28]宋耀良.中国史前神格人面岩画[M].上海:上海三联书店,1992.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2012-12-20