|Table of Contents|

Shift from the conventional paradigm to the scientific paradigm —transformation paths of Chinese media(PDF)

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2012年01期
Page:
96-103
Research Field:
文学
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Shift from the conventional paradigm to the scientific paradigm —transformation paths of Chinese media
Author(s):
ZHENG En1; 2
1. School of Journalism and Communication, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; 2. Institute of Communication, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, Zhejiang, China
Keywords:
media criticism;  academic institutionalization;  identity anxiety;  paradigm shift
PACS:
G206
DOI:
-
Abstract:
Through 10 years development, the study of media criticism has transfered from the stage of academic institutionalization to academic breeding. Scholars hold different views on the basic contents of media criticism, but have not formed broad academic consensus yet, which is detrimental to the breeding of academic theories. This situation reflects the anxieties of identity. Therefore, contemporary study of media criticism should undertake a self-reflection,shifting from normal science to the scientific revolution paradigm, and achieve the theoretical breeding. This paper provides three innovative paths for the study of media criticism, which is deep-ecology, media justice and the good governance of media. To achieve the new development and fulfill the academic inspirations, the study of media criticism should be set free from the shackles of pragmatism, utilitarianism and isolationism.

References:

[1] 戴维·斯沃茨.文化与权力:布尔迪厄的社会学[M].陶东风,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2006.
[2]胡翼青.传播学科建制发展的两难境地[J].当代传播,2011(3):4-7.
[3]华勒斯坦.学科·知识·权力[M].刘健芝,译.北京:三联书店,1999.
[4]刘建明.媒介批评通论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001.
[5]雷跃捷.媒介批评[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2007.
[6]李 岩.媒介批评:立场·范畴·命题·方式[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2005.
[7]董天策.媒介批评的空间:《中外媒介批评·第2辑》卷首语[J].新闻记者,2011(2):55-56.
[8]郑保卫.当前中国媒介批评的几个问题[J].现代传播,2010(4):20-23,58.
[9]陈 龙.论我国媒介批评理论体系的本土建构[J].山西大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2009,32(3):117-122.
[10]冯建三.媒介批评的历史轨迹与前景:以台湾为例[J].山西大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2011,34(2):65-70.
[11]王君超.我国媒介批评的现状与思考[J].报刊之友,2002(1):23-25.
[12]王君超.媒介批评:起源·标准·方法[M].北京:北京广播学院出版社,2001.
[13]Mannheim K.Essays on the sociology of knowledge[M].New York:Oxford University Press,1952.
[14]董天策,刘 薇.积极研究媒介批评·促进传媒健康发展:首届媒介批评国际学术论坛综述[J].新闻记者,2008(2):75-78.
[15]王君超,阿瑟·伯格.解码当代媒介的理论与方法:对话美国著名媒介分析家阿瑟·伯格教授[J].现代传播,2009(5):51-53.
[16]刘建明.“媒介批评”的概念崇拜与无标准论辨析[J].中国记者,2011(3):94-95.
[17]吴 飞.传播学研究的自主性反思[J].浙江大学学报:人文社会科学版,2009,39(2):121-128.
[18]董天策,胡 丹.中国内地媒介批评论著十年扫描[J].山西大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2011,34(2):71-75.
[19]雷 毅.阿伦·奈斯的深层生态学思想[J].世界哲学,2010(4):20-29.
[20]邵培仁.媒介生态学研究的新视野:媒介作为绿色生态的研究[J].徐州师范大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2008,34(1):135-144.
[21]罗尔斯.政治自由主义[M].万俊人,译.南京:译林出版社,2000.
[22]袁靖华.媒介正义论:走向正义的传播理论与实践[J].国际新闻界,2011(2):25-30.
[23]邵培仁.信息公平论:追求建立世界信息传播新秩序[J].浙江传媒学院学报,2008(2):25-29.
[24]O'Siochru S,Girard B, Mahan A.Global media governance[M].Oxford:Rowman & Littlefield,2002.
[25]郭镇之.舆论监督与西方新闻工作者的专业主义[J].国际新闻界,1999(5):32-38.
[26]谢 静.20世纪初美国的媒介批评与新闻专业主义确立[J].新闻与传播研究,2004,11(2):73-78,97.
[27]Kellner D,Share J.Toward critical media literacy:core concepts,debates,organizations and policy[J].Discourse:Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education,2005,26(3):369-386.
[28]彼埃尔·德·塞纳克伦斯.治理与国际调节机制的危机[J].冯炳昆,译.国际社会科学杂志:中文版,1999(1):91-103.
[29]刘易斯·A·科塞.导言[C]//刘易斯·A·科塞.社会学思想名家.石 人,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2007:1-12.
[30]李 彬.文化自觉:对中国新闻传播研究的一点反思[J].新闻与写作,2010(5):30-32.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2012-03-20