|Table of Contents|

Comparison for important views of honor and disgrace between China and the West(PDF)

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2011年04期
Page:
68-75
Research Field:
哲学
Publishing date:
2011-12-20

Info

Title:
Comparison for important views of honor and disgrace between China and the West
Author(s):
XIE Yang-ju
Institute of Chinese Thought and Culture, Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, Shaanxi, China
Keywords:
China;  the West;  view of honor and disgrace;  self-esteem
PACS:
B2
DOI:
-
Abstract:
Chinese ancient thinkers paid particular attention to the social and cultural function of the concept of honor and disgrace while western philosophers were skillful in the scientific and philosophical analysis of the concept of honor and disgrace. This paper tries to commentate and analyze various concepts of honor and disgrace, such as the concept of honor and disgrace from Chinese ritual culture and tradition, Confucius, Mencius, Guanzi, Xunzi, as well as from western philosophers such as Aristotle, Kant, Friedrich Paulsen, William James, John Rawls, etc. By contrast, the Chinese thinkers were good at making use of the concept of honor and disgrace to manage the society while the western philosophers preferred the analysis for the nature of honor and disgrace itself. Actually, the concept of honor and disgrace is one of key elements for the social stability and the progression of civilization. It is necessary to absorb the existing research achievements on the theory of honor and disgrace through comparative reflection, and to construct a culture of honor and disgrace which will accord with contemporary trend.

References:

[1] 菲利普·迪里巴尔纳.荣誉的逻辑[M].马国华,葛智强,译.北京:商务印书馆,2005.
[2]亚里士多德.尼各马可伦理学[M].廖申白,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003.
[3]康 德.道德形而上学原理[M].苗力田,译.上海:上海世纪出版集团,2005.
[4]康 德.实践理性批判[M].关文运,译.北京:商务印书馆,1960.
[5]康 德.实用人类学[M].邓晓芒,译.上海:上海世纪出版集团,2005.
[6]康 德.论优美感和崇高感[M].何兆武,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003.
[7]弗里德里希·包尔生.伦理学的体系[M].何怀宏,廖申白,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988.
[8]詹姆斯,万俊人,陈亚军.詹姆斯集[M].上海:上海远东出版社,2004.
[9]William James.The principles of psychology[M].Beijing:China Social Sciences Publishing House,1999.
[10]约翰·罗尔斯.正义论[M].何怀宏,何包钢,廖申白,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2011-12-20