|Table of Contents|

Interpretation of Socrates' political obligation thought ——based on Crito(PDF)

《长安大学学报(社科版)》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2011年01期
Page:
63-68
Research Field:
哲学
Publishing date:
2011-03-20

Info

Title:
Interpretation of Socrates' political obligation thought ——based on Crito
Author(s):
ZHAN Zhi-gang
Department of Philosophy, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, Jiangsu, China
Keywords:
Socrate persuasion or obedience doctrine political obligation Crito
PACS:
B12; D089
DOI:
-
Abstract:
In order to clarify the key problems in the source of western political obligation theory, a literature analysis is used to go over the moral justifications in Crito on citizens' obedience, and some comparisons are made among the interpretations of Crito provided by contemporary western philosophers. The analysis shows that different people may have different ideas on the obligation of persuasion, the justifications of obedience and the legitimacy of disobedience in Crito, but no one denies the fact that the arguments Socrates presented have a far-reaching impact on the development of political obligation theory.

References:

[1] 柏拉图.苏格拉底最后的日子[M].休·特里德尼克,谢善元,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2007.
[2]Woozley A D.Law and obedience:the arguments of Plato's Crito[M].Asheville:University of North Carolina Press,1979.
[3]Richard K.Socrates and the state[M].Princeton: Princeton University Press,1984.
[4]Bruce B.Persuade or obey[EB/OL].(2009-01-09)
[2010-04-28].http://brucebordner.Com/Writing _files/PersuadeObey.pdf.
[5]毛兴贵.政治义务:证成与反驳[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2007.
[6]徐 贲.苏格拉底对话中的“公民服从”:思想者的政治技艺[C]//邓正来.中国社会科学辑刊:冬季卷.上海:复旦大学出版社,2008:60-66.
[7]Brink D O.Democracy and disobedience in the Crito[R].San Diego:University of California-San Diego,2004.
[8]Masha M.Socrates misinterpreted and misapplied:an analysis of the constructed contradiction between the apology and the Crito[J].Macalester Journal of Philosophy,2004,13:1-9.
[9]Harry P.Toward an ethics of civil disobedience[J].Ethics,1967,77(3):176-192.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2011-03-20