|Table of Contents|

Essence of the dispute between Han school and Song school in Qing Dynasty and its influence(PDF)

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2010年03期
Page:
67-71
Research Field:
历史学
Publishing date:
2010-09-20

Info

Title:
Essence of the dispute between Han school and Song school in Qing Dynasty and its influence
Author(s):
HUANG Wei1;  ZHAO Li-wen2
1. School of Philosophy, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China; 2. School of Literature, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, Hebei, China
Keywords:
Qing Dynasty;  Song school;  Han school;  Confucian orthodoxy
PACS:
K249.105
DOI:
-
Abstract:
The review of the dispute between Han school and Song school in Qing Dynasty from the traditional angle can fully reveal its essence and influence. The analysis shows that the essence of the dispute between them is actually the one between the Confucianism and the authority. Shunzhi and Kangxi, after taking the name of Song school, gradually transform Confucians to the Confucian orthodoxy so that Song school in Qing Dynasty lost their chances to speak. In this case, a lot of Confucians of Han school had to look for new approach and open up new learning so that they could have their position before the authority and their new orthodoxy. However, their narrow scope in learning and the way of repelling anything and distrusting anybody resulted in the failure of their expectation and also the breakdown of themselves. With the great impact of European and American cultures, they were disintegrated step by step and became weaker in the contemporary idealogy.

References:

[1] 刘师培.清儒得失论:刘师培论学杂稿[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004.
[2]徐复观.两汉思想史[M].台北:学生书局,1979.
[3]钱 穆.中国学术思想史论丛[M].台北:东大图书公司,1980.
[4]朱维铮.清学史:汉学与反汉学一页[J].复旦大学学报:社会科学版,1993,59(5):23-26.
[5]梁启超.中国近三百年学术史[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2008.
[6]徐世昌.清儒学案[M].北京:中华书局,2008.
[7]朱维铮,江 藩,方东树.汉学师承记:外二种[M].北京:三联书店,1998.
[8]王德昭.清代科举制度研究[M].北京:中华书局,1984.
[9]陆德阳.道统学说的创建和重建:韩愈和荻生徂徕比较之三[J].华东师范大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2001,33(3):57-63,127.
[10]姜 鹏.北宋经筵中的师道实践[J].学术研究,2009,52(7):114-121.
[11]徐复观.中国思想史论集[M].台北:学生书局,1993.
[12]梁启超.清代学术概论[M].北京:东方出版社,1996.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2010-09-20