|Table of Contents|

Characteristics of technical assistance for urban transportation and effect(PDF)

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2008年01期
Page:
38-42
Research Field:
交通运输经济与管理
Publishing date:
2008-03-20

Info

Title:
Characteristics of technical assistance for urban transportation and effect
Author(s):
WANG Yuan-qing;  WANG Yao-wen;  SUN Chuan-jiao
School of Highway, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, Shaanxi, China
Keywords:
transportation economy;  urban transportation;  technical assistance;  Kirkpatrick model
PACS:
U12
DOI:
-
Abstract:
In order to discuss the effect appraisal method for the technical assistance projects in urban transportation, the paper, beginning from the definition, analyzes the characteristics of technical assistance, inspects one of the assistance projects training, and offers the method of Kirkpatrick model. This method divides the inspection and training into four levels:reflecting, studying, acting and resulting. Through “questionnaire survey based on the inspection report”, every index and the appraisal target are achieved. The examples of technical assistance Guangzhou center transportation are adopted to test the method. The result indicates that the method of Kirkpatrick model is feasible for effect appraisal of technical assistance.

References:

[1] 邵雨梅,罗 键.模糊评价方法在培训效果评估中的应用[J].福建电脑,2004,20(10):15-16.
[2]刘 迪,刘英洲,杨向阳.几种常用的培训效果评估方法的比较分析[J].科技资讯,2006,4(33):177-178.
[3]李 栋,王洪礼,李胜朋.市政交通项目综合评价[J].长安大学学报:社会科学版,2006,8(1):43-46.
[4]王建军,严宝杰,陈宽民.高速公路建设项目后评价若干问题探讨[J].长安大学学报:社会科学版,2005,7(2):4-8.
[5]许晓峰,肖 翔.建设项目后评价[M].北京:中华工商联合出版社,1999.
[6]彼得·罗西,霍华德·弗里曼,马克·李普希.项目评估方法与技术[M].邱泽奇,译.北京:华夏出版社,2002.
[7]朱仁宏.以柯氏模型为导向的培训评估体系研究[J].胜利油田职工大学学报,2006,20(4):1-3.
[8]余其红.培训评估体系探微[J].武汉工程职业技术学院学报,2006,18(3):70-72.
[9]王建军,王参军.公路建设项目后评价理论与方法研究[M].北京:人民交通出版社.2005.
[10]陈继红.试论科研项目评估体系与方法[J].华北水利水电学院学报:社科版,2001,17(3):85-87.
[11]李 萌,张秉先.培训效果的反映层面评价方法在实际中的应用[J].辽宁工学院学报:社会科学版,2006,8(4):39-43.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2008-03-20