|Table of Contents|

Study at the implied terms in contract law (PDF)

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2004年02期
Page:
51-54
Research Field:
法学
Publishing date:
2004-06-20

Info

Title:
Study at the implied terms in contract law
Author(s):
MA Yan-yan
Institute of Law, Shanghai Foreign Trade University, Shanghai 200336, China
Keywords:
implied terms;  express terms;  tenable implied terms;  self-determining;  excluding of implied terms
PACS:
D923.6
DOI:
-
Abstract:
As the tool formodifying contract,meaning of self-determining, countmediating and implied terms had the character of test case from the very beginning.They are classified into two:legal and putative implied terms, of which the later are sub-classified into the tenable based on contract and the tenable based on customs. The effect of self-determining and implied terms based on parties is not greater than that of express terms, and there is possibility of excluding. Due to its special function in decreasing the entanglements, protecting the interest of the legal party and stabilize the economic order, it is widely used all over the world after 20th century.Absorbing and transforming of implied terms in contract lawof our country are embodied in term 61 and 62 of contract law.

References:

[1]　崔建远.合同法[M].北京:法律出版社,1998.
[2]　Furmston M. P.Law of contract[M].Butterworth& Co. 1991.
[3]　胡林龙.合同默示条款的运用与研究[J].地方政府管 理,1999,(8).
[4]　高尔森.英美合同法纲要[M].南京:南京大学出版社, 1984.
[5]　王　盛,陈建光.英美合同法中的默示条款研究[J].浙 江省政法管理干部学院学报,1999,(2).
[6]　郭明瑞,房绍坤.新合同法原理[M].北京:人民出版 社,2000.
[7]　马俊驹,余延满.民法原论[M].北京:法律出版社, 1998.
[8]　冯大同.国际贸易法[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1995.
[9]　王传丽.国际贸易法[M].北京:法律出版社,1998.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2004-06-20