|Table of Contents|

Historical reference and realistic motivation of the emergence of grassroots flexible governance(PDF)

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2025年06期
Page:
73-85
Research Field:
社会学
Publishing date:
2025-12-30

Info

Title:
Historical reference and realistic motivation of the emergence of grassroots flexible governance
Author(s):
CHEN Zepeng1;  DU Zhimin1; 2
(1. School of Humanities, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, Shaanxi, China; 2. Key laboratory of Behavioral Science and Public Policy of Shaanxi Higher Education Institutions,Xi'an 710064, Shaanxi, China)
Keywords:
grassroots flexible governance;  flexible service;  rigid governance;  grass-roots society;  modernization of grassroots governance
PACS:
D630
DOI:
-
Abstract:
To explore the source of flexible governance at the grassroots level, based on the theoretical perspective of historical institutionalism, this paper constructs a two-dimensional analysis framework of “historical reference-realistic motivation”, reviews the requirements of the times and practical challenges, and systematically explains the logic of the emergence of grassroots flexible governance by tracing back the ideological origin and practical facts. The findings indicate that the emergence of grassroots flexible governance is the result of the timely coupling of flexible governance model and the space-time situation of China's grassroots governance. The flexible governance ideas advocated by Confucianism, Taoism and Mohism in the pre-Qin period of ancient China and the flexible governance practice of grassroots society in the form of emotional integration, moral mobilization and rational mediation provide historical reference for the emergence of grassroots flexible governance. The requirements of the times to promote the modernization of grassroots governance and the failure dilemma of grassroots rigid governance in complex society jointly constitute the realistic motivation for the emergence of grassroots flexible governance. The findings further indicate that grassroots flexible governance not only has profound historical feasibility, but also has strong practical necessity. Promoting the emergence of grassroots flexible governance is of great significance to the construction of a new pattern of grassroots governance with more adaptability, inclusiveness and sustainability. In the future, we should nourish realistic innovation with historical reference, lead the continuation of history with realistic motivation, and steadily promote the modernization of the grassroots governance system and governance capability in the process of connecting the past and the future.

References:

[1] 中共中央关于进一步全面深化改革 推进中国式现代化的决定[N].人民日报, 2024-07-22(1).
[2]潘小娟,孙蕊,张雅茹.中国式现代城乡基层善治:之魂、之道、之术[J].北京行政学院学报,2025(2):78-86.
[3]孙超群.基层治理的复合转向:一种面向复杂社会样态的治理逻辑[J].湖北社会科学,2022(3):44-51.
[4]欧阳静.简约治理:超越科层化的乡村治理现代化[J].中国社会科学,2022(3):145-163.
[5]张康之.时代特征中的复杂性和不确定性[J].学术界,2007(1):49-58.
[6]刘笑言.论基层治理刚性化倾向的破解之道[J].理论视野,2024(12):64-70.
[7]HART A G. Anticipations, business planning and the cycle[J]. The quarterly journal of economics,1937(2):273-297.
[8]康芳.空间、文化和制度:乡村柔性治理的三维检视[J].云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2023(3):120-128.
[9]兰立山.论技术治理与道德治理[J].自然辩证法通讯,2025(2):36-43.
[10]严飞.文化参与推动文化治理:社会治理现代化的新视角[J].天府新论,2025(1):127-135.
[11]吴晓凯.当代社会情感治理的逻辑演绎与实践反思[J].宁夏社会科学,2022(2):152-160.
[12]庞尚尚.“行政-政治-情感”:复合科层制视野下社会矛盾化解的多维逻辑[J].甘肃行政学院学报,2025(1):107-117.
[13]陈泽鹏,雷晓康.“递进式创熟”:城市社区治理共同体的柔性建构之道[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2025(4):81-91.
[14]伊丽莎白·桑德斯,张贤明.历史制度主义:分析框架、三种变体与动力机制[J].学习与探索,2017(1):42-49.
[15]田湘波.路径依赖和关键节点理论视角下的巡察制度变迁[J].宁夏社会科学,2021(2):48-54.
[16]道格拉斯·C·诺斯.制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M].刘守英,译.上海:上海三联书店,1994.
[17]乔瓦尼·卡波奇,R.丹尼尔·凯莱曼,彭号阳,等.关键节点研究:历史制度主义中的理论、叙事和反事实分析[J].国外理论动态,2017(2):14-28.
[18]牢记历史经验历史教训历史警示 为国家治理能力现代化提供有益借鉴[N].人民日报,2014-10-14(1).
[19]翟学伟.中国人的行动逻辑[M].上海:三联书店,2017.
[20]林存光,郜喆.追寻理想治道——略论儒家的礼乐刑政观[J].北京联合大学学报(人文社会科学版),2023(4):76-82.
[21]萧公权.中国政治思想史:上册[M].北京:商务印书馆,2010.
[22]胡象明,刘鹏,肖琳.老子治理思想的价值取向及其对当代中国治理的启示[J].中国行政管理,2022(8):122-127.
[23]郭江滨,吴新颖.老子柔性管理思想的架构智慧与驱动活力[J].江苏社会科学,2019(4):122-127.
[24]刘太刚,张驰.理论建构模式下的墨家“十论”——兼论对公共管理的启示[J].河南社会科学,2021(12):44-53.
[25]秦晖.传统十论[M].北京:东方出版社,2014.
[26]谢清果,林凯.礼乐协同:华夏文明传播的范式及其功能展演[J].新闻与传播评论,2018(6):59-68.
[27]郭星华,隋嘉滨.徘徊在情理与法理之间——试论中国法律现代化所面临的困境[J].中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2010(2):118-121.
[28]吴晓林.理解中国社区治理:国家、社会与家庭的关联[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2020.
[29]滋贺秀三.明清时期的民事审判与民间契约[M].王亚新,范愉,陈少峰,译.北京:法律出版社,1998.
[30]梁漱溟.中国文化要义[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2005.
[31]裴宜理.重访中国革命:以情感的模式[J].中国学术,2001(4):97-121.
[32]中共中央文献研究室.习近平关于社会主义社会建设论述摘编[M].北京:中央文献出版社,2017.
[33]习近平.决胜全面建成小康社会 夺取新时代中国特色社会主义伟大胜利——在中国共产党第十九次全国代表大会上的报告(2017年10月18日)[N].人民日报,2017-10-28(1).
[34]何艳玲,张雪帆.危机即新纪元:基于本体论反思的公共行政理论重构[J].政治学研究,2019(5):82-96.
[35]李玉轩.党建引领基层柔性治理的有效性分析——基于上海市H区的经验[J].湖湘论坛,2024(6):27-39.
[36]中共中央 国务院关于加强基层治理体系和治理能力现代化建设的意见[N].人民日报, 2021-07-12(1).
[37]史普原,李晨行.从单位制到项目制:中国国家治理机制沿革[J].公共管理学报,2023(1):20-30.
[38]李义波.从城市到社区:改革开放以来城市治理的空间转换与治理创新[J].南京社会科学,2018(10):89-94.
[39]张康之.基于组织环境的组织模式重建[J].行政论坛,2014(5):1-8.
[40]哈尔特穆特·罗萨.加速:现代社会中时间结构的改变[M].董璐,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2015.
[41]刘阳.后工业时代人的再生产与经济部类划分[J].东方学刊,2024(2):106-113.
[42]李泽厚.实用理性与乐感文化[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2005.
[43]雷晓康,陈泽鹏,刁心怡.治理文明新形态:推进社会治理现代化的中国逻辑[J].中国应急管理科学,2023(2):13-28.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2025-12-30