«Previous Article|Table of Contents|Next Article»

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:

2025年05期

Page:

11-39

Research Field:

思政课建设

Publishing date:

2025-10-25

Info

Title:

Discussion on the theoretical logic and practical path of classification reform and development of higher education institutions

Author(s):

DU Binheng¹;  WANG Chuanyi²;  CHEN Wenqian²;  NI Hao³;  GE Xinyong⁴;  LEI Yancun⁵;  LIU Zhentian⁶

Keywords:

classification development of higher education institutions;  popularization of higher education;  world-class universities;  high-level research-oriented universities;  comprehensive agricultural universities;  humanities-oriented universities;  classification evaluation of higher education institutions

PACS:

G640

DOI:

-

Abstract:

The classification reform and development of higher education institutions is a universal trend and fundamental experience in global higher education reform and development. It is also a major policy and reform direction for deepening comprehensive reform in China's higher education sector. The “2024—2035 Master Plan on Building China into a Leading Country in Education” proposes advancing reform and development of higher education institutions in three types: research-oriented, application-oriented, and skills-oriented, while integrating two basic directions: comprehensiveness and specialization. This approach provides policy guidance and reform pathways for promoting classification reform and development of higher education institutions in the context of building a Leading Country in Education. Focusing on the theoretical logic of classification reform and development of higher education institutions, this study provides a theoretical analysis and case study on the classification reform and development of different types of higher education institutions, such as world-class universities, high-level research-oriented universities, agricultural universities, and humanities and social sciences focused universities, as well as on key issues such as classification evaluation of higher education institutions. The study finds that the deepening of classification reform of higher education institutions must be firmly based on the fundamental laws of higher education reform and the positioning of university development. High-level research-oriented universities should focus on cultivating top innovative talents and driving major technological innovations, striving to become important talent centers and innovation hubs, providing talent and technological support for the country. Universities with industry characteristics in science, engineering, agriculture, and medicine should remain committed to their founding mission, strengthen cooperation with industries, promote industry integration, and focus on training application-oriented talents and technology transfer and transformation. Humanities and social science focused universities should emphasize the integration of talent and technology, maintain the cultural values and fine traditions of the humanities, and focus on using modern technologies to transform traditional disciplines. The study demonstrates that reform in classification evaluation is key to deepening classification reform and development of higher education institutions, requiring reforms in evaluation criteria, mechanisms, and methods. The key to the acceleration of reform in classification evaluation lies in guiding higher education institutions to create unique characteristics and strive for excellence in their respective fields, building a leading project for the goal of becoming a Leading Country in Education, and serving the nation's great practice of strengthening the country and national rejuvenation with the power of higher education.

References:

[1] 中共中央国务院印发《教育强国建设规划纲要(2024—2035年)》[N].人民日报,2025-01-20(6).
[2]杜彬恒,王潇晨.回顾与展望:中国高校分类问题研究20年——基于CiteSpace知识图谱的分析[J].高等建筑教育,2019(1):1-10.
[3]潘懋元,陈厚丰.高等教育分类的方法论问题[J].高等教育研究,2006(3):8-13.
[4]马陆亭.以高校分类发展支撑国家强国建设[J].北京大学教育评论,2023(2):2-9,187.
[5]张应强,周钦.“双一流”建设背景下的高校分类分层建设和特色发展[J].大学教育科学,2020(1):14-21.
[6]陈厚丰.中国高校分类标准及指标体系设计[J].高等教育研究,2008(6):8-14.
[7]马陆亭.新时代高等教育的结构体系[J].中国高教研究,2021(9):18-24.
[8]李立国,薛新龙.建立以人才培养定位为基础的高等教育分类体系[J].教育研究,2018(3):62-69.
[9]2023年全国教育事业发展统计公报[EB/OL].(2024-10-24)[2025-01-31].http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/sjzl_fztjgb/202410/t20241024_1159002.html.
[10]赵庆年,祁晓.高等学校分类管理:内涵与具体内容[J].教育研究,2013(8):48-56.
[11]陈昌芸,刘振天.我国高校分类管理政策的演变历程、多重逻辑及优化路径:审视《国家中长期教育改革和发展规划纲要(2010—2020年)》实施十年[J].江苏高教,2021(10):35-45.
[12]杜彬恒,吴琦,张可云,等.构建支持全面创新体制机制的理论阐释和实践路径[J].长安大学学报(社会科学版),2024(5):1-37.
[13]王战军,卢晓中,刘继安,等.笔谈:教育强国的科学内涵和建设路径[J].大学教育科学,2025(1):4-21.
[14]教育部发展规划司.2023年全国教育事业发展基本情况[EB/OL].(2024-03-01)[2025-01-28].http://www.moe.gov.cn/fbh/live/2024/55831/sfcl/202403/t20240301_1117517.html.
[15]王传毅,辜刘建,袁济方.基于学科特色的高校分类研究——以“双一流”建设高校为例[J].中国高教研究,2022(11):38-44.
[16]陈晓艳.清华大学发布三个2030中长期战略规划[EB/OL].(2021-12-01)[2025-01-28].https://www.tsinghua.edu.cn/info/1182/89412.htm.
[17]屈秋林.北航4米×3米气动声学风洞建设项目技术指标验收评审会召开[EB/OL].(2024-08-09)[2025-01-28].https://news.buaa.edu.cn/info/1002/63134.htm.
[18]CHENG S W,ROBERT M H,QIUMING C,et al.The deep-time digital earth program:data-driven discovery in geosciences[J].Natio-nal science review,2021(8):1-11.
[19]左雨晴.给大地盖上棉被——黑土地保护性耕作的“梨树模式”[EB/OL].(2021-07-22)[2025-01-28].https://news.cau.edu.cn/art/2021/7/22/art_8779_773171.html.
[20]习近平.在哲学社会科学工作座谈会上的讲话(2016年5月17日)[N].人民日报,2016-05-19(2).
[21]刘振天.现代高等教育评价体系建设:成效、经验及完善之路[J].社会科学战线,2021(3):223-232.
[22]保罗·福塞尔.格调:社会等级与生活品味[M].梁丽真,乐涛,石涛,译.北京:世界图书出版社,2011.

Memo

Memo:

-

Common functions

Last Update: 2025-10-25