|Table of Contents|

The logic and countermeasures of digital trade leading the high-quality development of manufacturing industry——Verification from the perspective of the Yangtze River Delta (PDF)

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2024年06期
Page:
87-106
Research Field:
国际经济与贸易
Publishing date:
2024-12-30

Info

Title:
The logic and countermeasures of digital trade leading the high-quality development of manufacturing industry——Verification from the perspective of the Yangtze River Delta
Author(s):
JIN Zehu;  LI Xinrui
(School of Economics, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, Anhui, China)
Keywords:
digital trade;  manufacturing;  high-quality development;  Yangtze River Delta;  cross-border e-commerce
PACS:
F752
DOI:
-
Abstract:
This study investigates the direction and pathways through which digital trade influences the high-quality development of the manufacturing sector, using 41 prefecture-level cities in the Yangtze River Delta as samples from 2010 to 2022. Employing a multi-dimensional comprehensive evaluation index system, the entropy method was applied to assess the levels of high-quality development in both digital trade and the manufacturing sector within these cities. A two-way fixed effect model was then used to analyze how digital trade enhances the quality of manufacturing development through the transformation of new and old growth drivers and consumption upgrading. The robustness of these findings was confirmed by varying measurement methods and regression models, using lagged variables, changing sample groups, performing dimensional regression, and applying the instrumental variable method and high-dimensional fixed effect method. Additionally, a multi-period difference-in-differences approach was employed to examine the policy impact of the “cross-border e-commerce pilot” on manufacturing's high-quality development.The study reveals that digital trade significantly fosters the high-quality development of the manufacturing sector. The primary channels through which digital trade positively impacts manufacturing include the industrial structure upgrading effect, technological innovation effect, and human capital improvement effect. Moreover, the establishment of cross-border e-commerce notably promotes high-quality manufacturing development, with this effect exhibiting marginal growth over time. The findings suggest that the Yangtze River Delta region should enhance collaborative innovation, jointly address critical shared technological challenges, and advance digital infrastructure to bridge regional disparities, thereby achieving high-quality manufacturing development through the constant integration of digital trade with the manufacturing sector.

References:

[1] 李轩,李珮萍.“一带一路”主要国家数字贸易水平的测度及其对中国外贸成本的影响[J].工业技术经济,2021(3):92-101.
[2]杨慧瀛,杨宏举,符建华.数字贸易如何影响全球价值链位置攀升——基于RCEP框架内国家的经验证据[J].国际经济合作,2022(2):76-87.
[3]贾怀勤,高晓雨,许晓娟,等.数字贸易测度的概念架构、指标体系和测度方法初探[J].统计研究,2021(12):30-41.
[4]王迎,纪洁,于津平.数字贸易发展水平如何影响一国对外贸易利益[J].国际经贸探索,2023(12):21-38.
[5]赵春明,杨宏举.数字贸易如何影响统一大市场建设:基于中国272个地级市的经验证据[J].世界经济研究,2024(2):3-17,135.
[6]刘红,张陈陈,朱为利.数字贸易的减污降碳效应分析[J].国际商务(对外经济贸易大学学报),2024(2):61-80.
[7]韦志文,冯帆.数字贸易对碳排放的影响——基于“一带一路”沿线48国的经验证据[J].现代经济探讨,2023(8):65-77.
[8]官华平,郭滨华,张建武.数字贸易、技术扩散与劳动力技能结构[J].国际经贸探索,2023(5):89-106.
[9]朱金生,郭可尘.数字贸易对中国高质量充分就业的影响[J].技术经济,2024(2):10-21.
[10]JURAN J M.Quality-control handbook[M].New York:McGraw-Hill,1951.
[11]JOSHI D,NEPAL B,RATHORE A P S,et al.On supply chain competitiveness of Indianautomotive component manufacturing industry[J].International journal of production economics,2013(1):151-161.
[12]李琳,王蔚阳.中国制造业发展质量的空间异质性研究——基于投影寻踪模型的分析[J].华东经济管理,2020(9):1-11.
[13]高运胜,杨阳.全球价值链重构背景下我国制造业高质量发展目标与路径研究[J].经济学家,2020(10):65-74.
[14]张青,李溪,周振.创新要素集聚、财税激励与制造业高质量发展[EB/OL].(2024-07-18)[2024-08-04].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/61.1329.C.20240717.1235.002.html.
[15]高丽娜,宋慧勇.创新驱动、人口结构变动与制造业高质量发展[J].经济经纬,2020(4):81-88.
[16]曾宪聚,严江兵,周南.深圳优化营商环境的实践经验和理论启示:制度逻辑与制度融贯性的视角[J].经济体制改革,2019(2):5-12.
[17]白少君,刘欢,张曼,等.企业家精神、工匠精神对先进制造业企业高质量发展的影响机制[J].2024(1).
[18]张广胜,孟茂源.内部控制、媒体关注与制造业企业高质量发展[J].现代经济探讨,2020(5):81-87.
[19]GIUDICE M D.Discovering the Internet of Things(IoT)within the businessprocess management:a literature review on technological revitalization[J].Business process management journal,2016(2):263-270.
[20]张倩男,苏莹童.数字贸易对全球价值链位势攀升的影响研究——基于我国制造业细分行业数据的实证[J].经济问题探索,2023(8):179-190.
[21]鲁慧鑫,冯宗宪.数字贸易限制与中国制造业全球价值链分工地位[J].经济体制改革,2024(3):93-102.
[22]卓乘风,邓峰.互联网发展如何助推中国制造业高水平“走出去”?——基于出口技术升级的视角[J].产业经济研究,2019(6):102-114.
[23]刘婧玲,刘经珂,陈艳莹.跨境电商综试区提升了城市制造业出口技术复杂度吗?[J].世界经济研究,2024(7):58-71,135.
[24]袁其刚,王敏哲.数字贸易赋能制造业质量变革机制与效应——来自跨境电子商务综合试验区的准自然试验[J].工业技术经济,2022(1):62-70.
[25]黄令,王亚飞,伍政兴.制造业高质量发展与数字贸易——来自2012—2020年省域面板数据的检验[J].现代管理科学,2023(4):136-145.
[26]王瑞荣.数字贸易推动浙江省制造业高质量发展的对策建议[J].现代管理科学,2021(1):114-120.
[27]徐艳,周欢怀.数字贸易背景下绍兴市制造业高质量发展路径研究[J].改革与开放,2022(6):19-24,43.
[28]费方域,闫自信,陈永伟,等.数字经济时代数据性质、产权和竞争[J].财经问题研究,2018(2):3-21.
[29]王娟.数字经济驱动经济高质量发展:要素配置和战略选择[J].宁夏社会科学,2019(5):88-94.
[30]李春发,李冬冬,周驰.数字经济驱动制造业转型升级的作用机理——基于产业链视角的分析[J].商业研究,2020(2):73-82.
[31]FORMAN C,ZEEBROECK N.From wires to partners:how the internet has fostered R&D collaborations within firms[J].Management science,2012(8):1549-1568.
[32]宋歌.数字经济时代加快传统制造业转型升级研究[J].产业创新研究,2019(12):116-118.
[33]孙玉颖.数字服务贸易自由化对制造业出口国内增加值率提升的影响研究[D].保定:河北大学,2022.
[34]任同莲.数字化服务贸易与制造业出口技术复杂度:基于贸易增加值视角[J].国际经贸探索,2021(4):4-18.
[35]惠宁,刘鑫鑫.互联网发展对中国区域创新能力的影响效应[J].社会科学研究,2020(6):30-37.
[36]姚战琪.数字贸易、产业结构升级与出口技术复杂度——基于结构方程模型的多重中介效应[J].改革,2021(1):50-64.
[37]PAUNOV C,ROLLO V.Has the internet fostered inclusive innovation in the developedworld?[J].World development,2016(78):587-609.
[38]刘维刚,倪红福.制造业投入服务化与企业技术进步:效应及作用机制[J].财贸经济,2018(8):126-140.
[39]马述忠,房超,梁银锋.数字贸易及其时代价值与研究展望[J].国际贸易问题,2018(10):16-30.
[40]张卫华,梁运文.中国数字贸易发展水平省域分异与空间效应[J].贵州社会科学,2020(12):129-138.
[41]冯宗宪,段丁允.数字贸易发展指数评价及影响因素分析——基于49个国家的面板数据[J].北京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2022(4):100-117.
[42]张勋,杨桐,汪晨,等.数字金融发展与居民消费增长:理论与中国实践[J].管理世界,2020(11):48-63.
[43]许和连,金友森,王海成.经理自主权对企业出口产品质量的影响研究[J].国际贸易问题,2020(8):52-66.
[44]刘啟仁,赵灿,黄建忠.税收优惠、供给侧改革与企业投资[J].管理世界,2019(1):78-96,114.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2024-12-30