|Table of Contents|

Development models, main achievements, and experience reference of overseas science and technology intermediary service industries(PDF)

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2024年04期
Page:
87-99
Research Field:
国际经济与贸易
Publishing date:
2024-08-20

Info

Title:
Development models, main achievements, and experience reference of overseas science and technology intermediary service industries
Author(s):
YANG Hongbin1; 3;  CHANG Rui2; 3
(1. School of Water and Environment, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710054, Shaanxi, China; 2. Department of Social Cooperation, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710018, Shaanxi, China; 3. School of Highway, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710054, Shaanxi, China)
Keywords:
science and technology intermediary;  service industry;  technology transfer;  science and technology intermediary institution;  world leader in science and technology
PACS:
F124.3; F719
DOI:
-
Abstract:
To explore the successful development models of overseas science and technology intermediary service industries and examine their relevance for the growth of the Chinese science and technology intermediary service sector, this study analyzes four key models: the market-oriented approach in the United States, the diversified hybrid model in the United Kingdom, the industry associations and technology transfer centers in Germany, and the government-driven model in Japan. It also systematically summarizes the operational outcomes of science and technology intermediary institutions in these four countries and investigates the future development path for the domestic sector. The findings reveal that a conducive policy and legal environment, diversified funding support, active cultivation of market entities, and strengthened infrastructure such as networking are fundamental to ensuring the healthy development of science and technology intermediary institutions. The research highlights that, within the broader context of building China into a world leader in science and technology and achieving high-level self-reliance in science and technology, the domestic sector should fully leverage the roles of government, market, and society. A combination of strategies, such as a market-driven operational system, diversified funding sources, socially-oriented services, professional institutional frameworks, integrated service capabilities, industrialized service methods, networked organizational structures, and scientific performance evaluations-should be adopted to foster sustainable growth.

References:

[1] 阳镇,贺俊.科技自立自强:逻辑解构、关键议题与实现路径[J].改革,2023(3):15-31.
[2]唐璐璐,吴纪攀.习近平总书记考察苏州工业园区的重要讲话激励干部群众[EB/OL].(2023-07-08)[2024-04-11].http://js.people.com.cn/n2/2023/0708/c360300-40486159.html.
[3]钟卫,陈彦.政府如何促进大学科技成果转化:基于发达国家的经验总结[J].中国科技论坛,2019(8):170-178.
[4]李晓华,李纪珍,杨若鑫.科技成果转化:研究评述与展望[J].外国经济与管理,2023(4):119-136.
[5]杨茜淋,王海芸.基于2018—2022年《全球创新指数》对国家创新效率提升的分析[J].科技中国,2023(4):17-21.
[6]张雪春,苏乃芳.科技成果转化的三元素:人才激励、资金支持和中介机构[J].金融市场研究,2023(4):113-122.
[7]郝涛,林德明,丁堃,等.“双一流”高校科技成果转化激励政策评价研究[J].中国科技论坛,2023(7):21-32.
[8]陈涛,张紫迎.高校科技成果转化中介作用的区域特征及影响因素——基于2019年高校专利权转让中介网络[J].生产力研究,2022(3):79-84.
[9]夏菲.健全科技中介服务体系促进科技成果转化[J].科技创新与应用,2021(27):187-190.
[10]刘媛媛.技术中介促进科技成果转化的作用机制研究[D].武汉:武汉理工大学,2017.
[11]朱鹏举,郭铭鹤.美国大学科研成果转化中的中介参与及其界面管理[J].中国高校科技,2021(7):87-92.
[12]杨红斌,荆秀艳,王鹏飞.加拿大大学科研管理机制研究及启示[J].世界科技研究与发展,2020(4):472-481.
[13]赵欣悦,袁勃.共同谱写中国式现代化建设的新篇章——习近平总书记在民革科技界环境资源界联组会上的重要讲话凝心聚力、振奋人心[EB/OL].(2024-03-07)[2024-04-11].http://lianghui.people.com.cn/2024/n1/2024/0307/c458561-40190440.html.
[14]汪俊枫,赵一智,宋之杰,等.基于边界组织和三螺旋理论的科技成果转化机构建设模式研究与启示[J].中阿科技论坛(中英文),2024(2):82-86.
[15]夏婷.英国国家战略科技力量建设与协同机制研究[J].中国科技产业,2023(2):56-59.
[16]安涌洁,刘海波.高校科技成果转化中知识产权管理系统的嵌入——基于对英国30所高校的分析[J].科技管理研究,2022(9):136-142.
[17]童嘉,任其龙,胡淳.高校有组织科技成果转化现状、问题与对策研究[J].创新科技,2024(4):22-30.
[18]朱婧.国外典型机构开展科技成果转化经验及对广东的启示——日本国立先进工业科学技术研究所案例[J].广东科技,2021(11):44-46.
[19]郭林杰.日本高校科技成果转化机构研究[D].长春:东北师范大学,2023.
[20]赵瑞瑞,纪喆.美国科技创新体系研究[J].科技与创新,2023(18):56-58.
[21]张红,苗润莲,蔚晓川.英国官产学研合作模式及其借鉴作用初探[J].情报工程,2015(1):49-56.
[22]刘娅.英国国家战略科技力量建设研究[J].中国科技资源导刊,2019(4):42-49.
[23]李姝影,李秋菊.英国政府发布创新战略[EB/OL].(2021-08-05)[2024-04-11].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzA3NTYzNjEwMw==&mid=2650917900&idx=1&sn=07b0b6a40e269315ca5ce395bce89fd6&chksm=8498e0e4b3ef69f20a833ee999cb93f6cd00420bbe221e0b2c4076207087eea2550c205657da&scene=27.
[24]韩小腾,严会超,郑鹏,等.中英高校科技成果转移转化比较研究及经验借鉴[J].科技管理研究,2019(7):121-126.
[25]蔺洁,王婷,陈亚平,等.英国大学科技园、科学城和弹射中心建设经验与启示[J].全球科技经济瞭望,2022(12):45-56.
[26]樊立宏,周晓旭.德国非营利科研机构模式及其对中国的启示——以弗朗霍夫协会为例的考察[J].中国科技论坛,2008(11):134-139.
[27]黄黎,向闱.浅析德国史太白技术转移中心运作模式及启示[J].湖北第二师范学院学报,2017(10):69-71.
[28]长城战略咨询.典型跨国技术转移机构案例分析[EB/OL].(2012-08-03)[2024-04-11].http://www.gei.com.cn/ycwz/4010.jhtml.
[29]王凤玉,王玥.斯坦福大学科技成果高效转化的运行机制研究[J].吉林师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2024(3):110-117.
[30]褚怡敏.美国高校科技成果转化的组织管理经验——以OTL为例[J].管理观察,2019(14):108-111.
[31]何宏.德国工业研究联盟联合会AiF及德国共性技术开发与创新研究[EB/OL].(2021-04-30)[2024-04-11].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzIxMTI4MzYxMQ==&mid=2247483871&idx=1&sn=e04642b3753231c2723f4502ba7583e1&chksm=9756fa2ba021733d7f69591c49e5bed39efb8d9a23e0d2fbc1519dda9ff81a076ee6fb7e231e&scene=27.
[32]孙晓麒,熊婷慧.德国史太白发展模式及对广东的启示[J].科技与金融,2019(11):21-24.
[33]张士运,刘彦蕊.德国史太白技术转移网络的发展经验与政策启示[J].中国科技论坛,2013(3):145-149.
[34]陈宝明.英国技术集团发展经验[J].高科技与产业化,2012(2):100-102.
[35]丁明磊,陈宝明.英国、德国经验对发展科技中介机构的借鉴[J].杭州科技,2014(2):61-62.
[36]宋连方.科技与金融结合试点政策对企业研发投资的影响[J].西部金融,2023(4):89-97.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2024-08-20