|Table of Contents|

Legalization of grassroots governance: institutional connotation and practical experience(PDF)

《长安大学学报(社科版)》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2023年06期
Page:
98-112
Research Field:
管理学
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Legalization of grassroots governance: institutional connotation and practical experience
Author(s):
TANG Jinjin
(School of Management, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620,China)
Keywords:
legalization of grassroots governance modernized governance system governance body rule of law system governance responsibility governanceefficiency neo-institutionalism
PACS:
D90-052; D630
DOI:
-
Abstract:
The legalization of grassroots governance stands as a pivotal objective and component in achieving modernized governance systems and capabilities. To advance this, striking a balance between the rule of law and efficiency is crucial. Drawing insights from literature and grounded in the Shanghai-based practice of grassroots governance, this paper aims to dissect its connotations and challenges. Our study discerns two core aspects crucial to the legalization of grassroots governance: the structured exercise of power alongside its harmonious interaction with rights, and the fusion of formal and informal systems to fortify governance's legitimacy and effectiveness. Elevating the rule of law at the grassroots level is instrumental in achieving this. It involves standardizing governance operations, leveraging the synergies of party building, deepening interconnected mechanisms to merge formal and informal governance resources, and instituting intelligent operational systems for enhanced effectiveness. However, tensions persist between governance ambiguity and the rigidity of legal frameworks. This tension is evident in systemic disparities, inter-departmental coordination hurdles, and challenges in performance evaluation. The theoretical framework of neo-institutionalism aids in comprehending the pragmatic rationale behind China's legalization of grassroots governance. While legalization and institutionalization can streamline governance costs and bolster grassroots resources, limitations also carve out space for strategic governance execution, potentially exacerbating dilemmas. Our research underscores the imperative of furthering the development of a straightforward and efficient grassroots governance structure. It stresses maximizing the collaborative role of grassroots party units, refining assessment and incentive mechanisms, and fostering equilibrium between order and dynamism within grassroots governance.

References:

[1] 郑成良.论法治理念与法律思维[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,2000(4):3-10.
[2]张文显.法治化是国家治理现代化的必由之路[J].法制与社会发展,2014(5):8-10.
[3]黄晓春,周黎安.“结对竞赛”:城市基层治理创新的一种新机制[J].社会,2019(5):1-38.
[4]周振超.构建简约高效的基层管理体制:条块关系的视角[J].江苏社会科学,2019(3):143-149.
[5]王志勇.自由裁量权异化在中国的表现与成因[J].学术月刊,2015(5):92-100.
[6]陈潭,梁世杰.组织动员,社区学习与应急治理——社区公共卫生应急治理的响应范式与实践逻辑[J].社会科学,2021(12):37-44.
[7]汤金金,孙荣.公共服务供给机制创新的路径选择:从惯性治理到动态治理[J].社会治理,2018(10):80-86.
[8]吴志攀.“互联网+”的兴起与法律的滞后性[J].国家行政学院学报,2015(3):39-43.
[9]孙笑侠.法治、合理性及其代价[J].法制与社会发展,1997(1):1-8.
[10]范柏乃,林哲杨.政府治理的“法治-效能”张力及其化解[J].中国社会科学,2022(2):162-184.
[11]张永宏.组织社会学的新制度主义学派[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2007.
[12]田凯,赵娟.组织趋同与多样性:组织分析新制度主义的发展脉络[J].经济社会体制比较,2017(3):172-180.
[13]孙荣,汤金金.政府购买公共服务:中国的理解与实践[J].情报杂志,2017(10):195-201.
[14]霍春龙,包国宪.新制度主义政治学视角下的制度有效性[J].内蒙古社会科学(汉文版),2010(1):15-18.
[15]蔡禾.国家治理的有效性与合法性——对周雪光、冯仕政二文的再思考[J].开放时代,2012(2):135-143.
[16]林尚立.在有效性中累积合法性:中国政治发展的路径选择[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2009(2):46-54.
[17]赵媛媛,黄迪民.“法治中国”建设中的基层治理法治化[J].青海社会科学,2015(4):88-93.
[18]陈柏峰.中国法治社会的结构及其运行机制[J].中国社会科学,2019(1):65-88.
[19]罗峰,徐共强.基层治理法治化视野下的权力清单制度——基于上海市两个街道的实证研究[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2018(2):158-168.
[20]卢福营.基层社会治理的政府创新应当法治化[J].浙江社会科学,2014(12):7-10.
[21]李占宾.基层治理的现实困境及法治化路径[J].河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016(1):16-21.
[22]郭庆松,陈奇星.推行政府权力清单制度:上海的实践与思考[J].行政管理改革,2015(7):50-54.
[23]叶敏.城市基层治理的条块协调:正式政治与非正式政治——来自上海的城市管理经验[J].公共管理学报,2016(2):128-140.
[24]陈亮,李元.去“悬浮化”与有效治理:新时期党建引领基层社会治理的创新逻辑与类型学分析[J].探索,2018(6):109-115.
[25]黄晓春.党建引领基层自治共治:实践与理论思考[J].党政论坛,2017(3):17-20.
[26]陈寒非.嵌入式法治:基于自组织的乡村治理[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版),2019(1):82-92.
[27]董幼鸿.大城市基层综合治理机制创新的路径选择——以上海城市网格化管理和联动联勤机制建设为例[J].上海行政学院学报,2015(6):31-37.
[28]巨云鹏.上海建设“一网统管”平台,让城市更智慧一块屏里的社会治理[N].人民日报,2020-04-29(11).
[29]张成岗.人工智能时代:技术发展、风险挑战与秩序重构[J].南京社会科学,2018(5):42-52.
[30]戚学祥.超越风险:区块链技术的应用风险及其治理[J].南京社会科学,2020(1):87-92.
[31]马长山.人工智能的社会风险及其法律规制[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2018(6):47-55.
[32]郑容坤,汪伟全.人工智能政治风险的意蕴与生成[J].江西社会科学,2020(5):217-225.
[33]欧阳静.运作于压力型科层制与乡土社会之间的乡镇政权 以桔镇为研究对象[J].社会,2009(5):39-63.
[34]郑生竹,李雄鹰.基层“属地管理”之惑:要管没权,不管“背锅”[J].半月谈,2018(18):2.
[35]周少来.权责不等、层层加码、前途无亮…如何破解乡镇治理“体制性困局”[J].半月谈,2020(3):4.
[36]彭勃,刘旭.破解基层治理的协同难题:数字化平台的条块统合路径[J].理论与改革,2022(5):42-56.
[37]胡业飞,崔杨杨.模糊政策的政策执行研究——以中国社会化养老政策为例[J].公共管理学报,2015(2):93-105.
[38]李瑞昌,侯晓菁.方案导向的非常规公共事务治理——以中国早期抗击新冠肺炎疫情为例[J].上海行政学院学报,2021(6):4-14.
[39]赵阳.“痕迹主义”:形式主义新变种[J].党员文摘,2018(9):12-24.
[40]陈朋.基层治理困境的体制性症结初探[N].中国社会科学报,2019-03-13(7).
[41]杨光斌.制度范式:一种研究中国政治变迁的途径[J].中国人民大学学报,2003(3):117-123.
[42]刘欣,胡安宁.中国公众的收入公平感:一种新制度主义社会学的解释[J].社会,2016(4):133-156.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2023-12-30