|Table of Contents|

Problems and countermeasures in the construction of an integrated society in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area——a case study of Nansha, Guangzhou(PDF)

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2023年05期
Page:
102-112
Research Field:
数字贸易研究
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Problems and countermeasures in the construction of an integrated society in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area——a case study of Nansha, Guangzhou
Author(s):
TAN Rui1;  DAI Mingjie1;  OU Yongmei2
(1. Institute of Public Policy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong,China; 2. Guangzhou Huaxia Vocational College, Guangzhou 510935, Guangdong, China)
Keywords:
Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area;  integrated society;  soft infrastructure;  modernization with Chinese characteristics;  Nansha of Guangzhou
PACS:
F127
DOI:
-
Abstract:
Social integration is not only a key symbol of the integration of Hong Kong and Macao into the overall development of China, but also an important content clearly stated in the Outline of the Development Plan for the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. In order to analyze and discuss the existing measures, current problems and improvement strategies in the field of integrated society construction in Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao, this paper selects Nansha area of Guangzhou City as a research case and explains the modernization connotation of soft infrastructure in the construction of an integrated society in Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao, using the three coordinates of China's modernization, i.e. material, institutional and human modernization as the analytical framework. On the basis of this concept, by analyzing Nansha's experience and existing shortcomings in social integration, this paper explores the social construction plan of the Greater Bay Area aiming at a deeply integrated society in Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao. The research believes that Nansha is mainly making efforts in the three core areas of “soft infrastructure”, namely employment, medical care and education, and promoting the integrated development of Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao in the field of social construction through specific measures in the two aspects of policy support system and cooperation platform construction. According to the study, Nansha needs to strengthen the construction of an integrated society in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area and take the lead in building an integrated development pattern in this location in the field of people's livelihood through coping strategies and countermeasures such as the relationship between “industry, city and people”, the supply system of public services and the sharing of people's livelihood resources.

References:

[1] 李永杰.促进粤港澳大湾区高水平协同发展[N].中国社会科学报,2023-09-15(2).
[2]郑永年.大汇合与大分流:大变局下的中国现代化[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,2023.
[3]ATKINS L C.Palaces for the people:how social infrastructure can help fightinequality,polarization,and the decline of civic life[J].Community development,2022,53(4):516-517.
[4]HU A,TANG X,YANG Z,et al.The modernization of China's stategovernance[M].Singapore:Springer,2017.
[5]LATHAM A,LAYTON J.Social infrastructure:why it matters and how urbangeographers might study it[J].Urban geography,2022,43(5):659-668.
[6]傅承哲,徐劲飞.粤港澳大湾区社会融合建构及其测度探析[J].广西社会科学,2021(1):1-9.
[7]VINOGRADOV A V,SALITSKAYA E A,SALITSKII A I.Science and technology in China:modernization accomplished[J].Herald of the Russian academy of sciences,2016,86(1):48-56.
[8]KOROTAYEV A,ZINKINA J,SLINKO E,et al.Human values and modernization:a global analysis[J].Journal of globalization studies,2019,10(1):44-71.
[9]谢宝剑.“一国两制”背景下的粤港澳社会融合研究[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版),2012,52(5):194-200.
[10]王韵清.广州南沙打造粤港澳全面合作示范区的优势分析[J].新经济,2020(11):54-55.
[11]姚迈新.粤港澳大湾区公共物品供给的治理难题及对策[J].探求,2018(1):110-115.
[12]傅承哲,杨爱平.港澳青年跨境就业创业政策的心理融合效应及其认知机制——基于行为公共管理的视角[J].学术论坛,2020(1):79-89.
[13]钟韵.港澳青年参与南沙新区发展研究[J].城市观察,2017(6):67-74.
[14]黄炳超,黄明东,周丽萍.要素互动视角下粤港澳大湾区高等教育协调发展的内在机理及实践路径[J].高等工程教育研究,2023(5):124-130.
[15]田新朝.跨境养老服务:粤港澳大湾区的协同合作[J].开放导报,2017(5):109-112.
[16]程慧,刘玉亭.从边缘城市到湾区中心:粤港澳大湾区建设背景下的南沙定位[J].城市观察,2018(3):26-35.
[17]伍文中,李静,许家瑜.技术还是制度:粤港澳大湾区公共服务合作瓶颈约束及路径创新[J].贵州财经大学学报,2023(5):1-13.
[18]马向明,谢石营,陈伟劲,等.从粤港澳大湾区看南沙的独特性与协同发展[J].城市观察,2018(3):15-25.
[19]ESMAEILPOORARABI N,YIGITCANLAR T,KAMRUZZAMAN M,et al.Conceptual frameworks of innovation district place quality:an opinion paper[EB/OL].(2020-01-21)[2023-03-08].https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837719314619.
[20]葛志专,巫细波.粤港澳大湾区建设背景下南沙空间结构优化对策建议[J].经济论坛,2020(12):95-104.
[21]陈嘉奇,陈曦然,朱汉平.粤港澳大湾区背景下南沙人才政策优化探讨——基于“政策工具-人力资源管理”模型的分析[J].中国人事科学,2021(2):72-79.
[22]李锦峰.公共服务供给空间布局的基层创变——以上海浦东新区“家门口”服务体系为例[J].理论与改革,2022(2):112-122,151.
[23]邱晨,王志远,廖建军.基于步行可达性的“15分钟社区生活圈”覆盖率研究——以广州南沙城区为例[J].上海城市管理,2022,31(3):77-85.
[24]章鸿雁.粤港澳大湾区三大合作区居住条件配建研究——以人才引进为背景[J].中国房地产,2020(24):17-23.
[25]夏美玲.创新人群需求导向下的城市创新空间发展策略研究[D].北京:北京建筑大学,2019.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2023-12-01