|Table of Contents|

Overview of theoretical research on world modernization(PDF)

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2023年01期
Page:
1-25
Research Field:
马克思主义理论研究
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Overview of theoretical research on world modernization
Author(s):
DAI Mucai
(School of Marxism, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)
Keywords:
theory on world modernization;  Chinese path to modernization;  dependency theory;  western Marxism;  classical modernization theory
PACS:
D61; B15
DOI:
-
Abstract:
Since the 1950s and 1960s, the international community has conducted in-depth, systematic and lasting theoretical research on the world modernization movement. From the classical modernization theory to the anti-modernization theory, the post modernization theory and the new modernization theory, a colorful world picture has been formed. The classical modernization theory once had a wide worldwide influence, but it also encountered more and more doubts, amendments and even negations in the face of new phenomena, new problems and new challenges arising from the development of world modernization. According to the new phenomena, new problems and new fields in the development of world modernization, anti-modernization theory, post modernization theory and new modernization theory have all carried out pioneering and innovative research, which to some extent is a criticism, negation and revision of classical modernization theory, thus making modernization theory more persuasive and explanatory in new ways. From the perspective of the modernization theory that forms the theoretical system and exerts worldwide influence, there are mainly the endogenous and exogenous theories, the classical modernization theory and the dependency theory, the modernization of people theory, the modernization evaluation standard theory, the modernity theory, etc.

References:

[1] 习近平.高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜 为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗[N].人民日报,2022-10-26(1).
[2]罗荣渠.现代化新论——世界与中国的现代化进程[M].增订本.北京:商务印书馆,2004.
[3]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯文集:第5卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2009.
[4]何传启.中国现代化报告2011:现代化科学概论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2011.
[5]张敦福.依附理论的发展历程和新进展[J].山东师大学报(社会科学版),2000(1):28-31.
[6]亨利·列斐伏尔.日常生活批判[M].叶齐茂,倪晓晖,译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2018.
[7]赫伯特·马尔库塞.单向度的人——发达工业社会意识形态研究[M].刘继,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2014.
[8]尤尔根·哈贝马斯.合法化危机[M].刘北成,曹卫东,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2000.
[9]HORKHEIMER M.The authoritarian state[C]//ARATO A,CEBHARDT E.The essential Frankfurt school reader.New York:The Continuum Publishing Company,1985:95-117.
[10]埃里希·弗罗姆.逃避自由[M].陈学明,译.北京:工人出版社,1987.
[11]乌尔里希·贝克,安东尼·吉登斯,斯科特·拉什.自反性现代化:现代社会秩序中的政治、传统与美学[M].赵文书,译.北京:商务印书馆,2014.
[12]丹尼尔·贝尔.后工业社会的来临——对社会预测的一项探索[M].高铦,王宏周,魏章玲,译.北京:新华出版社,1997.
[13]INGLEHART R F.Modernization and postmodernization:cultural,economic,and political change in 43 societies[M].Princeton:Princeton University Press,1997.
[14]戴维·赫尔德.民主与全球秩序:从现代国家到世界主义治理[M].胡伟,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2003.
[15]英格尔斯.人的现代化——心理、思想、态度、行为[M].殷陆君,编译.成都:四川人民出版社,1985.
[16]国家社科基金重大项目课题组.区域现代化理论与实践研究[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2014.
[17]中国现代化战略研究课题组,中国科学院中国现代化研究中心.中国现代化报告概要(2001—2007)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2007.
[18]中国科学院可持续发展研究组.2001中国可持续发展战略报告[M].北京:科学出版社,2001.
[19]迈克·费瑟斯通.消解文化——全球化、后现代主义与认同[M].杨渝东,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2009.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2023-03-01