|Table of Contents|

Practical exploration on the revitalization mechanism of rural homesteads under the guidance of the separation of three rights policy(PDF)

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2022年06期
Page:
71-82
Research Field:
社会学
Publishing date:
2022-12-20

Info

Title:
Practical exploration on the revitalization mechanism of rural homesteads under the guidance of the separation of three rights policy
Author(s):
LIU Yong;  HAO Ketong;  WU Wei;  LI Yaqi
(School of Architecture, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710060, Shaanxi, China)
Keywords:
separation of three rights;  rural homestead;  rural revitalization strategy;  land utilization;  cooperation between rural villages and enterprises;  rural economy
PACS:
F321.1
DOI:
-
Abstract:
As the issue of separation of three rights(rural land ownership rights, contract rights, and management rights)in rural homesteads has gradually become a focus of attention of the government and society, the importance of rural homesteads to further revitalize the market and develop space needs has gradually emerged. This paper compares the evolution of China's rural homestead policy and different development models, and discusses the connotation of the separation of three rights policy. Taking Guanting Village, Liquan County, Shaanxi Province as a case, using the methods of questionnaire research and in-depth interviews, through the analysis of the actual number of land parcels for the current rural homesteads, per capita ownership, and the population's intention to use homesteads, etc., this paper studies the development and transformation of rural homesteads, and explores practical strategies for the use of homesteads. The research results show that, driven by the rural revitalization strategy and the demand for urban-rural balance, there are four dilemmas in the development of homesteads: lack of institution, confusion in market order, difficulty in meeting the needs of multiple interest subjects, and lack of practical application compared to theoretical guidance. Through practical models such as index complementation, industrial integration, and leisure sharing, the revitalization mechanism of rural homesteads under the system of separation of three rights is formed. It contains the following contents: find out the number of abandoned homesteads, and convert some construction land into arable land; bring in cultural enterprises, establish the local experience, boutique homestays and other new business forms and new functions to achieve a three-way win-win situation for enterprises, village collectives and villagers; modernize and adapt the original rural housing units to better suit the elderly, enable the urban residents and original residents to share the space for old-age care; utilize the actual construction and operational results to verify the feasibility of the development model, so that the development dilemma of rural homesteads can be alleviated.

References:

[1] 关浩杰.乡村振兴战略的内涵、思路与政策取向[J].农业经济,2018(10):3-5.
[2]LUCAS R E.Life earnings and rural-urban migration[J].Journal of politicaleconomy,2004,112(1):29-59.
[3]刘彦随,刘玉,翟荣新.中国农村空心化的地理学研究与整治实践[J].地理学报,2009,64(10):1193-1202.
[4]杨遂全.论宅基地资格权确权及其法理依据——以财产属性为视角[J].中国土地科学,2020,34(6):35-40.
[5]张建平,葛扬.土地配置扭曲与城乡收入差距——基于城镇化不平衡发展的视角[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2021(3):172-181,192.
[6]魏程琳.财产化还是治理化:宅基地“三权分置”改革的目标厘定与方案构建[J].农业经济问题,2021(12):37-49.
[7]汪明进,赵兴泉,黄娟.农村宅基地“三权分置”改革的经验与启示——基于浙江省义乌市的实践视角[J].世界农业,2019(8):104-108.
[8]曲卫东,斯宾德勒.德国村庄更新规划对中国的借鉴[J].中国土地学,2012,26(3):91-96.
[9]张丽叶.欧美亚农业发达国家新型农业经营主体发展趋势及启示[J].世界农业,2017(11):90-96.
[10]吴婷婷,陈宣鹏,吴松洋.土地流转背景下农地金融制度研究——美国、德国、日本、中国台湾地区的经验与启示[J].当代经济,2020(10):30-33.
[11]赵颖文,吕火明,李晓.日本农业适度规模经营推行背景、应对举措及对中国启示[J].中国农业资源与区划,2019,40(4):202-209.
[12]WASILEWSKI A,KRUKOWSKI K.Land conversion for suburban housing:a study of urbanization around Warsaw and Olsztyn,Poland[J].Environmental management,2004,34(2):291-303.
[13]严金明,迪力沙提,夏方舟.乡村振兴战略实施与宅基地“三权分置”改革的深化[J].改革,2019(1):5-18.
[14]陈胜祥.农村宅基地“三权”分置:问题导向、分置逻辑与实现路径[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2022,22(2):147-158.
[15]张军涛,游斌.城乡融合发展视角下宅基地制度改革路径[J].农村经济,2021(2):20-27.
[16]余樟青.宅基地“三权分置”改革原因、问题与对策[J].现代农业研究,2022,28(1):146-148.
[17]夏柱智.面向乡村振兴的宅基地“三权分置”:政策解析、基本模式和实践困境[J].贵州社会科学,2021(9):162-168.
[18]罗湖平.宅基地“三权分置”改革的农户响应程度及其影响因素——浏阳市实证[J].经济地理,2021,41(8):187-194.
[19]华心如.宅基地闲置成因及解决路径探究[J].湖北农业科学,2018,57(19):35-38.
[20]张勇,周婕,陆萍.乡村振兴视阈下盘活利用农村闲置宅基地的理论与实践——基于安徽省两个案例的考察[J].农业经济问题,2022(4):96-106.
[21]黄贻芳,钟涨宝.不同类型农户对宅基地退出的响应:以重庆梁平县为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2013(7):31-36.
[22]郑兴明.探索闲置宅基地城乡共建共享新模式:内在逻辑、困境与路径——基于城乡融合发展的视角[J].现代经济探讨,2022(2):25-32.
[23]鄂施璇,王兆林.三权分置下宅基地发展权的权利结构与实现形式[J].资源科学,2021,43(7):1419-1427.
[24]刘双良.宅基地“三权分置”助推乡村振兴的多重逻辑与实现路径[J].贵州社会科学,2021(3):146-152.
[25]贺雪峰.宅基地、乡村振兴与城市化[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2021,21(4):1-8.
[26]汪明进,赵兴泉,黄娟.激活闲置农房和宅基地经验、问题和思考——基于浙江四地改革实践的启示[J].农业经济,2019(12):70-72.
[27]袁宇峰,潘伟光.资本禀赋对农户宅基地退出意愿的影响[J].河北科技师范学院学报(社会科学版),2021,20(4):25-32.
[28]罗翔,赖志勇.长三角区域人口流动与分布的影响机制:业缘还是乡缘?——以苏浙皖来沪人员为例[J].上海经济,2021(6):49-60.
[29]田鹏.城乡融合发展进程中村落共同体变迁及秩序重建[J].华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2021,20(3):119-128.
[30]崔超.逻辑与进路:农村宅基地集体所有权实现与集体经济发展——基于马克思所有权理论的视角[J].山东社会科学,2022(3):135-142.
[31]王亚星,于水.“求同”与“存异”:异质性资源禀赋视域下宅基地三权分置实现路径研究——基于典型案例的对比分析[J].宁夏社会科学,2022(2):43-52.
[32]商梦雅,李江.城乡融合视角下农村宅基地制度改革的价值选择与实现路径研究[J].农村经济,2021(12):37-45.
[33]曲衍波,柴异凡,朱伟亚,等.基于“诊断-设计-结果”框架的农村宅基地退出模式原型分析[J].资源科学,2021,43(7):1293-1306.
[34]王静萱.试论北方农村宅基地存在的主要问题及管理对策[J].山西农经,2020(24):153-154.
[35]张勇.乡村振兴背景下农村宅基地盘活利用问题研究[J].中州学刊,2019(6):37-42.
[36]温彩璇,许月明,胡建,等.乡村振兴背景下宅基地“三权分置”权能实现路径研究[J].世界农业,2018(10):243-247.
[37]刘述良.通往健全乡村之路:基于协同治理的视角[J].南京社会科学,2021(10):56-61,74.
[38]李怀,陈享光.乡村振兴背景下宅基地“三权分置”的权能实现与深化路径[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2020,20(6):28-34.
[39]乔陆印,刘彦随.新时期乡村振兴战略与农村宅基地制度改革[J].地理研究.2019,38(3):655-666.
[40]李泉,李梦,鲁科技.“三权分置”视域中的农村土地信托模式比较研究[J].山东农业科学,2019,51(1):161-167.
[41]蒋和平,郭超然,蒋黎.乡村振兴背景下中国农业产业的发展思路与政策建议[J].农业经济与管理,2020(1):5-14.
[42]臧得顺.臧村“关系地权”的实践逻辑——一个地权研究分析框架的构建[J].社会学研究,2012,27(1):78-105.
[43]贺立龙,曾钰婷,付春生,等.乡村振兴视角下社会资本参与宅基地盘活的减贫兴农效应——来自农房联建的案例与证据[J].管理学刊,2020,33(2):11-24.
[44]庄晋财,齐佈云.前景理论视角下不同类型农户的宅基地退出行为决策研究[J].农林经济管理学报,2022,21(1):87-94.
[45]贾宁凤,白怡鸽,乔陆印,等.农村闲置宅基地空间分异及其驱动因素——以山西省长子县为例[J].经济地理,2020,40(12):166-173,190.
[46]苑韶峰,傅锦威,申屠楚宁.农村土地整治视角下宅基地退出模式优选——以浙江省典型县市为例[J].贵州大学学报(社会科学版),2021,39(6):74-82,122.
[47]李欢,张安录.农村宅基地退出前后农户福利测度及其动态变化——以浙江省德清县201户农户为例[J].农业技术经济,2019(7):79-90.
[48]吴潇竞.乡村振兴战略背景下闲置宅基地盘活研究——以合肥市三十岗乡为例[C]//.智启雄安——第九届公共政策智库论坛暨乡村振兴与“一带一路”国际研讨会论文集.河北省公共政策评估研究中心,2021:242-249.
[49]王维,刘燕丽.农村养老服务体系的整合与多元建构[J].华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2020,19(1):103-116.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2022-12-20