|Table of Contents|

Digital trade rules and impact of CPTPP——a comparative analysis with RCEP(PDF)

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2022年03期
Page:
22-33
Research Field:
国际经济与贸易
Publishing date:
2022-05-20

Info

Title:
Digital trade rules and impact of CPTPP——a comparative analysis with RCEP
Author(s):
DAI Lihua1;  LV Yutong2; 3;  CHEN Hongsong4
(1. School of Economics, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250399, Shandong, China; 2. School of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China; 3. Research Institute of China Common Prosperity, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314000, Zhejiang, China; 4. School of Economics, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 625099, Sichuan, China)
Keywords:
CPTPP;  RCEP;  DEPA;  digital trade;  digital trade rules;  global governance;  source code;  new development pattern of dual circulation
PACS:
F744
DOI:
-
Abstract:
China's application to join the “Comprehensive and Progressive Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement”(CPTPP)can bring opportunities to the development of China's international trade and investment, and promote China's active participation in global economic and trade governance from the perspective of rules. Focusing on the field of digital trade, based on the method of text analysis, this paper analyzes the impact of CPTPP's digital trade rules and their implications to China by comparing the digital trade rules of CPTPP and RCEP. The research suggests that CPTPP has a wider range of digital trade rules than RCEP, covering exclusive articles such as “Non-Discriminatory Treatment of Digital Products”, “Source Code”, “Principles on Access to and Use of the Internet for Electronic Commerce” and “Internet Interconnection Charge Sharing”. At the same time, CPTPP's digital trade rules have higher standards, more mandatory requirements, fewer exceptions and relatively higher requirements for contracting parties. To benchmark the high standard CPTPP's digital trade rules can facilitate digital enterprises to reduce trade cost and lower market access threshold, build a benign competitive environment, and promote the long-term and high-quality development of China's digital trade. It can help boost confidence in multilateralism and globalization, promote the construction of global digital trade rules, and enhance China's ability to participate in the global governance of digital trade. It is also conducive to enabling related fields in China to deepen mechanism and system reform, improve China's level of institutional opening-up, and promote the construction of a new pattern of dual circulation. As a big power in digital trade, China needs to seize the opportunity of the implementation of RCEP to make up for its shortcomings, promote the orderly integration of domestic standards and CPTPP rules, and further promote the cooperation of Asian-Pacific countries in the field of digital trade by accelerating DEPA negotiations.

References:

[1] 郑伟,钊阳.数字贸易:国际趋势及我国发展路径研究[J].国际贸易,2020(4):56-63.
[2]盛斌,高疆.数字贸易:一个分析框架[J].国际贸易问题,2021(8):1-18.
[3]韩剑,蔡继伟,许亚云.数字贸易谈判与规则竞争——基于区域贸易协定文本量化的研究[J].中国工业经济,2019(11):117-135.
[4]张茉楠,周念利.数字贸易对全球多边贸易规则体系的挑战、趋势及中国对策[J].全球化,2019(6):32-46,135.
[5]盛斌.中国、CPTPP和国际经贸新规则[J].中国经济评论,2021(4):92-96.
[6]崔岩,杜明威.“东亚模板”数字贸易规则相关问题探析——基于中日韩合作的视角[J].日本学刊,2021(4):62-82,145-146,149-150.
[7]白洁,苏庆义.CPTPP的规则、影响及中国对策:基于和TPP对比的分析[J].国际经济评论,2019(1):58-76,6.
[8]余淼杰,蒋海威.从RCEP到CPTPP:差异、挑战及对策[J].国际经济评论,2021(2):129-144.
[9]李墨丝.CPTPP+数字贸易规则、影响及对策[J].国际经贸探索,2020,36(12):20-32.
[10]洪俊杰,陈明.巨型自由贸易协定框架下数字贸易规则对中国的挑战及对策[J].国际贸易,2021(5):4-11.
[11]彭德雷,张子琳.RCEP核心数字贸易规则及其影响[J].中国流通经济,2021,35(8):18-29.
[12]贺小勇,黄琳琳.WTO电子商务规则提案比较及中国之应对[J].上海政法学院学报(法治论丛),2020,35(1):105-114.
[13]岳云嵩,霍鹏.WTO电子商务谈判与数字贸易规则博弈[J].国际商务研究,2021,42(1):73-85.
[14]周念利,李玉昊,刘东.多边数字贸易规制的发展趋向探究——基于WTO主要成员的最新提案[J].亚太经济,2018(2):46-54,150.
[15]周念利,吴希贤.美式数字贸易规则的发展演进研究——基于《美日数字贸易协定》的视角[J].亚太经济,2020(2):44-51,150.
[16]陈寰琦.签订“跨境数据自由流动”能否有效促进数字贸易——基于OECD服务贸易数据的实证研究[J].国际经贸探索,2020,36(10):4-21.
[17]王中美.跨境数据流动的全球治理框架:分歧与妥协[J].国际经贸探索,2021,37(4):98-112.
[18]石静霞.数字经济背景下的WTO电子商务诸边谈判:最新发展及焦点问题[J].东方法学,2020(2):170-184.
[19]冉从敬,何梦婷,刘先瑞.数据主权视野下我国跨境数据流动治理与对策研究[J].图书与情报,2021(4):1-14.
[20]林发勤,刘梦珣,吕雨桐.双循环新发展格局下区域经济一体化策略——兼论RCEP潜在影响[J].长安大学学报(社会科学版),2021,23(1):80-92.
[21]林跃勤.全球经济治理变革与新兴国家制度性话语权提升研究[J].社会科学,2020(11):16-28.
[22]周念利,陈寰琦.数字贸易规则“欧式模板”的典型特征及发展趋向[J].国际经贸探索,2018,34(3):96-106.
[23]周念利,陈寰琦.RTAs框架下美式数字贸易规则的数字贸易效应研究[J].世界经济,2020,43(10):28-51.
[24]于鹏,廖向临,杜国臣.RCEP和CPTPP的比较研究与政策建议[J].国际贸易,2021(8):27-36.
[25]任保平.“十四五”时期构建基于双循环新发展格局的政治经济学逻辑[J].长安大学学报(社会科学版),2021,23(1):2-7.
[26]徐康宁.扩大对外开放的新机遇、新理念与新方向——重要战略机遇期的文明互鉴与制度型开放[J].江海学刊,2019(1):84-91,254.
[27]戴翔.制度型开放:中国新一轮高水平开放的理论逻辑与实现路径[J].国际贸易,2019(3):4-12.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2022-05-20