|Table of Contents|

Institutional innovation in Hubei Pilot Free Trade Zone: practical features, theoretical connotations and policy enlightenment(PDF)

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2022年01期
Page:
35-52
Research Field:
国际经济与贸易
Publishing date:
2022-03-01

Info

Title:
Institutional innovation in Hubei Pilot Free Trade Zone: practical features, theoretical connotations and policy enlightenment
Author(s):
QIAN Xuefeng1; 2;  WANG Bei2; 3
(1. School of Business and Administration, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, Hubei, China; 2. School of China(Hubei)Pilot Free Trade Zone, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, Hubei, China; 3. School of Economics and Business Administration, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, Hubei, China)
Keywords:
pilot free trade zone;  institutional innovation;  economic logic;  Hubei;  location advantage;  institutional transaction cost;  high standards of openness;  service-oriented government;  dual circulation;  financial openness
PACS:
F752.8
DOI:
-
Abstract:
The construction of the Hubei Pilot Free Trade Zone is a systematic exploration and strategic practice to comprehensively deepen reforms and expand opening-up in the new stage of development. From the perspectives of dynamic evolution theory and institutional change, transaction cost theory of institutional economics, and public goods supply and demand in public economics, this paper systematically studies the theoretical logic and practical significance of institutional innovation in the pilot free trade zone. The study finds that the Hubei Pilot Free Trade Zone has carried out a series of institutional innovation practices in terms of accelerating the transformation of government functions, deepening reforms in the investment field, promoting trade transformation and upgrading, boosting financial opening-up and innovation, innovation-driven development, and serving the national strategy. The effort has gradually formed a progressive reform and innovation development path extending from offline to online and offline coordinated development, from common areas to characteristic areas, from the preceding items to the end of the overall arrangement, and the simultaneous development of reference from other examples and innovation as well as integration of generalized promotion and independent application. The study believes that in order to promote the institutional innovation of the Hubei Pilot Free Trade Zone, and to give full play to its functional connotations in solving the deep-level structural development contradictions of the local area and expanding the growth enabling space, it is necessary to strengthen the design of the top-level system and strengthen the interfacing with the domestic and international dual circulation new development pattern, to transform government supervision functions and improve market supervision by improving the design of the supervision system and improving the efficiency of administrative services, to build a legal framework and policy system that is compatible with international norms and is composed of laws and regulations, government regulations, and regulatory documents, and to coordinate the incentive orientation between the overall strategic goal that tests the national system and yields experience as well as local real needs seeking to inject vitality and impetus to regional economic development; at the level of specific implementation paths, it is necessary to continue to optimize the opening-up platform and business environment, strengthen the construction of port smart functions, focus on cultivating and strengthening large-scale cities, large-scale hubs, large-scale ports, large-scale platforms, large-scale industries, and first-class business environment, etc., to build a new open economy system and a multi-dimensional quantitative evaluation index system, to achieve the organic coordination and unity among the pilot free trade zone institutional innovation and practice exploration, experience and effectiveness review and verification, empowered social and economic development, and long-term construction planning goals, thus facilitating Hubei in building a new highland of inland opening-up in the new era.

References:

[1] 张幼文.自贸区试验的战略内涵与理论意义[J].世界经济研究,2016(7):3-12.
[2]裴长洪.全球治理视野的新一轮开放尺度:自上海自贸区观察[J].改革,2013(12):30-40.
[3]沈国兵.上海自由贸易试验区建立对中国经贸发展的影响[J].社会科学家,2013(12):61-68.
[4]陈爱贞,刘志彪.自贸区:中国开放型经济“第二季”[J].学术月刊,2014(1):22-30.
[5]商务部国际贸易经济合作研究院课题组.中国(上海)自由贸易试验区与中国香港、新加坡自由港政策比较及借鉴研究[J].科学发展,2014(9):5-17.
[6]张幼文.自贸区试验与开放型经济体制建设[J].学术月刊,2014(1):11-19.
[7]李猛.中国自贸区服务与“一带一路”的内在关系及战略对接[J].经济学家,2017(5):50-57.
[8]张明,郭子睿.上海自贸区:进展、内涵与挑战[J].金融与经济,2013(12):19-22.
[9]王孝松,张国旺,周爱农.上海自贸区的运行基础、比较分析与发展前景[J].经济与管理研究,2014(7):52-64.
[10]杜金岷,苏李欣.上海自贸区金融创新风险防范机制研究[J].学术论坛,2014,37(7):26-30,35.
[11]罗素梅,周光友.上海自贸区金融开放,资本流动与利率市场化[J].上海经济研究,2015(1):29-36.
[12]罗素梅,周光友.利率市场化的阶段性特征:基于上海自贸区诉求[J].改革,2014(10):28-36.
[13]王冠凤,郭羽诞.上海自贸区贸易便利化和贸易自由化研究[J].现代经济探讨,2014(2):28-32.
[14]盛斌.天津自贸区:制度创新的综合试验田[J].国际贸易,2015(1):4-10.
[15]蔡春林.广东自贸区建设的基本思路和建议[J].国际贸易,2015(1):15-21.
[16]林晓伟,李非.福建自贸区建设现状及战略思考[J].国际贸易,2015(1):11-14,35.
[17]赵大平.人民币资本项目开放模型及其在上海自贸区的实践[J].世界经济研究,2015(6):43-53.
[18]周汉民.我国四大自贸区的共性分析、战略定位和政策建议[J].国际商务研究,2015(4):36-46.
[19]张伟君.上海自贸试验区知识产权执法:自由贸易与打击侵权的平衡[J].外国经济与管理,2014(2):73-80.
[20]唐健飞.中国(上海)自贸区政府管理模式的创新及法治对策[J].国际贸易,2014(4):27-32.
[21]彭羽,陈争辉.中国(上海)自由贸易试验区投资贸易便利化评价指标体系研究[J].国际经贸探索,2014,30(10):63-75.
[22]田毕飞,李伟.内陆自贸区的建立与评价研究——以武汉为例[J].国际商务研究,2015(4):47-55.
[23]竺彩华,李锋.上海自贸区建设的主要成就与问题分析[J].社会观察,2016(1):107-111.
[24]陈一鼎,张怀洋,乔桂明.上海自贸区内金融机构发展态势剖析与问题透视[J].上海经济研究,2015(9):95-102.
[25]李虹,曾函,姚舜.天津自贸区金融创新动力机制与服务贸易协同发展研究[J].经营与管理,2020(6):6-9.
[26]谭娜,周先波,林建浩.上海自贸区的经济增长效应研究——基于面板数据下的反事实分析方法[J].国际贸易问题,2015(10):14-24,86.
[27]王利辉,刘志红.上海自贸区对地区经济的影响效应研究——基于“反事实”思维视角[J].国际贸易问题,2017(2):3-15.
[28]殷华,高维和.自由贸易试验区产生了“制度红利”效应吗?——来自上海自贸区的证据[J].财经研究,2017,43(2):48-59.
[29]刘秉镰,吕程.自贸区对地区经济影响的差异性分析——基于合成控制法的比较研究[J].国际贸易问题,2018(3):51-66.
[30]张军,闫东升,冯宗宪,李诚自贸区设立能够有效促进经济增长吗?——基于双重差分方法的动态视角研究[J].经济问题探索,2018(11):125-133.
[31]叶修群.自由贸易试验区与经济增长——基于准自然实验的实证研究[J].经济评论,2018(4):18-30.
[32]叶霖莉.中国自贸区的经济增长效应评估——基于沪津闽粤自贸区的实证研究[J].国际商务研究,2020(3):97-108.
[33]冯帆,许亚云,韩剑.自由贸易试验区对长三角经济增长外溢影响的实证研究[J].世界经济与政治论坛,2019(5):118-138.
[34]魏蓉蓉,李天德.自贸区设立与经济高质量发展——基于FTA建设的准自然实验证据[J].商业经济与管理,2020(5):77-87.
[35]刘秉镰,王钺.自贸区对区域创新能力的影响效应研究——来自上海自由贸易试验区准实验的证据[J].经济与管理研究,2018,39(9):65-74.
[36]何勤,杨琼.上海自贸区贸易便利化对贸易流量影响的实证研究[J].价格理论与实践,2014(11):98-100.
[37]江若尘,余典范,翟青,等.中国(上海)自由贸易试验区对上海总部经济发展的影响研究[J].外国经济与管理,2014(4):65-71.
[38]项后军,何康. 自贸区的影响与资本流动——以上海为例的自然实验研究[J].国际贸易问题,2016(8):3-15.
[39]宋丽颖,郭敏.自贸区政策对地方财力的影响研究——基于双重差分法和合成控制法的分析[J].经济问题探索,2019(11):18-28.
[40]谭建华,严丽娜.自由贸易试验区设立与企业技术创新[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2020(2):48-56.
[41]黄少安.关于制度变迁的三个假说及其验证[J].中国社会科学,2000(7):37-49.
[42]周小亮.体制改革性质绩效的理论分析与深化改革中实现利益兼容的制度调整[J].福建论坛(人文社会科学版),2006(3):77-81.
[43]裴长洪.全球经济治理、公共品与中国扩大开放[J].经济研究,2014(3):4-19.
[44]唐莹,吴琼华.深化“放管服”改革的制度经济学分析[J].陕西行政学院学报,2018(2):49-54.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2022-03-01