|Table of Contents|

Hot areas, characteristics and enlightenment of urban environmentalgovernance research: knowledge map analysis based onliterature from SSCI(2004-2019)(PDF)

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2021年02期
Page:
85-96
Research Field:
经济与管理
Publishing date:
2021-03-10

Info

Title:
Hot areas, characteristics and enlightenment of urban environmentalgovernance research: knowledge map analysis based onliterature from SSCI(2004-2019)
Author(s):
SI Linbo1; 2;  LIU Shanshan1
1. School of Public Administration, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, Hebei, China; 2. School of Public Administration, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, Shaanxi, China
Keywords:
urban environmental governance;  urban planning;  urban ecosystem;  urbanization;  sustainability;  knowledge map
PACS:
G353.1; X321
DOI:
-
Abstract:
In order to promote the development of the theory and practice of urban environmental governance in China, this article takes 5 332 related documents collected in the SSCI database from 2004 to 2019 as sample sources, uses co-word analysis methods, social network analysis methods and visualization techniques to conduct a knowledge map analysis on the international urban environmental governance research literature, and study the current status, characteristics and trends of urban environmental governance research. This study believes that the five hot areas of urban environmental governance research in the past 16 years include urban sustainability, urban climate change governance, China’s urbanization development, urban ecosystem and urban environmental governance model. It shows that urban sustainability is the foundation of hot research areas in urban environmental governance; climate change is highly correlated with ecosystems; China’s rapid urbanization is accompanied by many urban problems such as incoordination in development and fragmentation of city landscape to a certain extent; sustainability and flexibility provide a conceptual analysis framework for the urban environmental governance model, and multi-level governance and diversification provide a theoretical basis for the urban environmental governance model. The study believes that climate change governance, urban ecosystem services, and the promotion of the establishment of green spaces will become important trends in urban environmental governance research in the future. The future urban environmental governance research should also pay close attention to the localization and interdisciplinary research on the urban environmental governance theory.

References:

[1] Bulkeley H,Betsill M.Rethinking sustainable cities:multilevel governance and the "urban" politics of climate change[J].Environmental Politics,2005,14(1):42-63.
[2]Driessen P P J,Dieperink C,Laerhoven V F,et al.Towards a conceptual framework for the study of shifts in modes of environmental governance-experiences from the Netherlands[J].Environmental Policy and Governance,2012,22(3):143-160.
[3]McCormick K,Anderberg S,Coenen L,et al.Advancing sustainable urban transformation[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2013,50:1-11.
[4]Hansen R,Frantzeskaki N,McPhearson T,et al.The uptake of the ecosystem services concept in planning discourses of european and american cities[J].Ecosystem Services,2015,12:228-246.
[5]Shi P J,Yu D Y.Assessing urban environmental resources and services of Shenzhen,China:a landscape-based approach for urban planning and sustainability[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2014,125:290-297.
[6]姜爱林,陈海秋,张志辉.城市环境治理若干理论研究[J].宁夏社会科学,2008(3):35-40.
[7]刘丹.基于二级模糊综合评价的城市环境可持续发展能力评价[J].统计与决策,2014(18):56-59.
[8]秦天宝,段帷帷.多元共治视角下湾区城市生态文明建设路径探究[J].环境保护,2016,44(10):33-36.
[9]俞雅乖,刘玲燕.我国城市环境绩效及其影响因素分析[J].管理世界,2016(11):176-177.
[10]甘甜,王子龙.长三角城市环境治理效率测度[J].城市问题,2018(1):81-88.
[11]徐梦佳,刘冬.城镇化进程中生态环境管治的国际经验与启示[J].中国环境管理,2019,11(1):123-127,131.
[12]贾文龙.国内环境治理领域的热点主题与演化趋势研究——基于CSSCI来源期刊论文的计量分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2019,33(6):1-10.
[13]张勤,马费成.国外知识管理研究范式——以共词分析为方法[J].管理科学学报,2007(6):65-75.
[14]Shen L Y,Ochoa J J,Shah M N,et al.The application of urban sustainability indicators-a comparison between various practices[J].Habitat International,2011,35(1):17-29.
[15]McCormick K A,Coenen L,Nei L.Advancing sustainable urban transformation[J].Journal of Cleaner Pronuction,2013,50:1-11.
[16]Kabisch N,Frantzeskaki N,Pauleit S,et al.Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas:perspectives on indicators,knowledge gaps,barriers,and opportunities for action[J].Ecology and Society,2016,21(2):1-15.
[17]Raymond C M,Frantzeskaki N,Kabisch N,et al.A framework for assessing and implementing the co-benefits of nature-based solutions in urban areas[J].Enviromental Science & Policy,2017,77(7):15-24.
[18]Corburn J.Cities climate change and urban heat island mitigation:localising global environmental science[J].Urban Studies,2009,46(2):413-427.
[19]Leck H,Simon D.Fostering multiscalar collaboration and co-operation for effective governance of climate change adaptation[J].Urban Studies,2013,50(6):1221-1238.
[20]Brink E,Wamsler C.Collaborative governance for climate change adaptation:mapping citizen-municipality interactions[J].Environmental Policy and Governance,2018,28(2):82-97.
[21]Wu J G,Xiang W N,Zhao J Z.Urban ecology in China:historical developments and future directions[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2014,125:222-233.
[22]Long H L,Liu Y Q,Hou X G,et al.Effects of land use transitions due to rapid urbanization on ecosystem services:implications for urban planning in the new developing area of China[J].Habital International,2014,44:536-544.
[23]Chen J L,Gao J L,Chen W.Urban land expansion and the transitional mechanisms in Nanjing,China[J].Habital International,2016,53:274-283.
[24]Gómez-Baggethun E,Gren A,McPhearson T,et al.Urban ecosystem services[EB/OL].(2013-10-05)[2020-06-11].https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/81898141.pdf.
[25]Molnar J N,Kubiszewski I.Managing natural wealth:research and implementation of ecosystem services in the United States and Canada[J].Ecosyst.Services,2012,2:45-55.
[26]Mc Phearson T,Hamstead Z,Kremer P.Urban ecosystem services for resilience planning and management in New York city[J].Ambio,2014,43:502-515.
[27]Hansen R,Frantzeskaki N,McPhearson T.The uptake of the ecosystem services concept in planning discourses of European and American cities[J].Ecosystem Services,2015,12:228-246.
[28]Langemeyer J,Gomez-Baggethun E,Haase D,et al.Bridging the gap between ecosystem service assessments and land-use planning through Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis(MCDA)[J].Environmental Science & Policy,2016,62(2):45-46.
[29]Haase D,Larondelle N,Andersson E,et al.A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments:concepts,models,and implementation[J].Ambio,2014,43(4):413-433.
[30]Lizarralde G,Chmutina K,Bosher L,et al.Sustainability and resilience in the built environment:the challenges of establishing a turquoise agenda in the UK[J].Sustainable Cities and Society,2015(15):96-104.
[31]Arts B,Leroy P,Van Tatenhove J P M.Political modernisation and policy arrangements:a framework for understanding environmental policy change[J].Public Organization Review,2006,6(2):93-106.
[32]Glasbergen P.Co-operative environmental governance:public-private agreements as a policy strategy[M].Berlin:Springer Science & Business Media,1998.
[33]Driessen P P J,Glasbergen P,Verdaas C.Interactive policy-making; a model of management for public works[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2001,128:322-337.
[34]Folke C,Hahn T,Olsson P,et al.Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems[J].Annual Review of Environment and Resources,2005,30:441-473.
[35]While A,Jonas AEG,Gibbs D.The environment and the entrepreneurial city:searching for the urban ’sustainability fix’ in Manchester and Leeds[J].International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,2004,28(3):549-569.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2021-03-10