|Table of Contents|

Research status and trend analysis of digital trade(PDF)

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2021年02期
Page:
75-84
Research Field:
经济与管理
Publishing date:
2021-03-10

Info

Title:
Research status and trend analysis of digital trade
Author(s):
ZHANG Xiaheng1; 2
1. School of Business, Northwest University of Political Science and Law, Xi’an 710122, Shaanxi,China; 2. School of Economics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, Zhejiang, China
Keywords:
digital trade;  cross-border e-commerce;  trade regulation;  digital economy;  Baidu index;  knowledge map
PACS:
F49; F752.8
DOI:
-
Abstract:
In order to study the specific application scenarios of digital trade in practical areas and the hotspots in its research, this paper conducts bibliometric and visualized analysis on digital trade through CiteSpace V, SPSS 21.0 and Excel 2010 etc. using "digital trade" as key words in the Baidu Index search based on the research results of CNKI database on digital trade as samples. It believes that China’s academic research on digital trade is in the early stage of exploration, and its theoretical research lags behind the needs of practical development. The current research hotspots in the field mainly focus on the definition and extension of the research connotations, the new development trends of digital trade, international digital trade development rules, and issues related to digital trade and cross-border e-commerce, etc. With the widespread application of digital trade in the Internet and traditional fields, the digital trade rule construction and governance, the relationship between digital trade and cross-border e-commerce, the comparison of domestic and foreign digital trade, and related elements of digital trade will become new trends in the digital trade research.

References:

[1] Weber R H.Digitaltrade in WTO-law-taking stock and looking ahead[J].SSRN Electronic Journal, 2010,5(1):1-24.
[2]熊励,刘慧,刘华玲.数字与商务[M].上海:上海社会科学院出版社,2011.
[3]United States International Trade Commission.Digital trade in the US andglobal economies[EB/OL].(2013-07-07)[2020-01-29].https://www.usitc.gov/publications/332/pu4415.pdf.
[4]孙杰.从数字经济到数字贸易:内涵、特征、规则与影响[J].国际经贸探索,2020(5):87-98.
[5]张夏恒.我国区块链能量分布与前沿热点趋势——基于核心文献样本分析[J].产业经济评论,2019(2):81-95.
[6]彭希羡,孙霄凌,朱庆华.国内社交网络服务研究的文献计量分析[J].情报科学,2012,30(3):414-418.
[7]孙雨生,仇蓉蓉,黄传慧,等.国内数字图书馆个性化服务研究进展:研究力量和知识基础[J].情报杂志,2013,32(12):175-182.
[8]林菡密,孙绍荣.2001～2010年基于CSSCI的行为经济学文献计量分析[J].现代情报,2011,31(5):92-97.
[9]姜春林,李江波,杜维滨.期刊文献计量与知识图谱对《情报科学》的解读[J].情报科学,2009,27(2):166-174.
[10]杨爱青,马秀峰,张风燕,等.g指数在共词分析主题词选取中的应用研究[J].情报杂志,2012,31(2):52-55.
[11]唐红娟.数字贸易:创造新消费奇迹?[J].新经济, 2009(12):36-37.
[12]夏杰长.数字贸易的缘起、国际经验与发展策略[J].北京工商大学学报(社会科学版), 2018(5):1-10.
[13]李忠民, 周维颖, 田仲他.数字贸易:发展态势、影响及对策[J].国际经济评论, 2014(6):131-144,8.
[14]蓝庆新,窦凯.美欧日数字贸易的内涵演变、发展趋势及中国策略[J].国际贸易,2019(6):48-54.
[15]陆菁,傅诺.全球数字贸易崛起:发展格局与影响因素分析[J].社会科学战线,2018(11):57-66.
[16]马述忠,房超,梁银锋.数字贸易及其时代价值与研究展望[J].国际贸易问题,2018(10):16-30
[17]陈超凡, 刘浩.全球数字贸易发展态势、限制因素及中国对策[J].理论学刊, 2018(5):48-55.
[18]张茉楠,周念利.中美数字贸易博弈及我国对策[J].宏观经济管理,2019(7):13-19,27.
[19]张群,周丹,吴石磊.我国数字贸易发展的态势、问题及对策研究[J].经济纵横,2020(2):106-112.
[20]刘洪愧.数字贸易发展的经济效应与推进方略[J].改革,2020(3):40-52.
[21]韩剑,蔡继伟,许亚云.数字贸易谈判与规则竞争——基于区域贸易协定文本量化的研究[J].中国工业经济,2019(11):117-135.
[22]周念利, 陈寰琦, 黄建伟.全球数字贸易规制体系构建的中美博弈分析[J].亚太经济, 2017(4):38-46,174-175.
[23]李墨丝.超大型自由贸易协定中数字贸易规则及谈判的新趋势[J].上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017(1):100-107
[24]李杨, 陈寰琦, 周念利.数字贸易规则“美式模板”对中国的挑战及应对[J].国际贸易, 2016(10):24-27.
[25]周念利, 陈寰琦.数字贸易规则“欧式模板”的典型特征及发展趋向[J].国际经贸探索, 2018,34(3): 96-106.
[26]汪晓文,宫文昌.国外数字贸易发展经验及其启示[J].贵州社会科学,2020(3):132-138.
[27]来有为,宋芳秀.数字贸易国际规则制定: 现状与建议[J].国际贸易,2018(12):54-57.
[28]龚柏华.论跨境电子商务/数字贸易的“eWTO”规制构建[J].上海对外经贸大学学报, 2016(6):18-28.
[29]李钢,张琦.对我国发展数字贸易的思考[J].国际经济合作,2020(1):56-65.
[30]张夏恒,李豆豆.数字经济、跨境电商与数字贸易耦合发展研究——兼论区块链技术在三者中的应用[J].理论探讨,2020(1):115-121.
[31]伊万·沙拉法诺夫, 白树强.WTO视角下数字产品贸易合作机制研究——基于数字贸易发展现状及壁垒研究[J].国际贸易问题, 2018(2): 149-163.
[32]高媛, 王涛.TISA框架下数字贸易谈判的焦点争议及发展趋向研判[J].国际商务:对外经济贸易大学学报, 2018(1): 149-156.
[33]戴龙.论数字贸易背景下的个人隐私权保护[J].当代法学,2020(1):148-160.
[34]彭德雷.数字贸易的“风险二重性”与规制合作[J].比较法研究,2019(1):172-186
[35]贾怀勤.数字贸易的概念、营商环境评估与规则[J].国际贸易,2019(9):90-96.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2021-03-10