«Previous Article|Table of Contents|Next Article»

¡¶³¤°²´óѧѧ±¨£¨Éç¿Æ°æ£©¡·[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:

2020Äê02ÆÚ

Page:

48-61

Research Field:

½»Í¨ÔËÊä

Publishing date:

Info

Title:

Influencing factors on the coopetition relationship between public bus and bike sharing based on traveler¡¯s choice

Author(s):

ZHOU Huiyu; ZHANG Chenyan;  LI Hongchang

(School of Economics and Management,Beijng Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

Keywords:

public bus; shared bike; MNL model; sustainable development; commuting efficiency; Beijing

PACS:

F572

DOI:

-

Abstract:

In order to better facilitate transports and promote the sustainable development of the entire urban transport system on the ground, this paper mainly aims at studying the impact of shared bikes on the public bus based on the traveler¡¯s behavior choice from both competitive and cooperative perspectives. First, this paper studies the related literature on the influence of shared bikes on the public bus, including in cities in North America, Europe, Oceania, and Asia,and summarizes the relevant influencing factors. Second, an SP questionnaire survey has been conducted on travelers in Beijing and the MNL model is adopted to quantitatively analyze the effect of various factors on travelers¡¯ modal choices between bus and shared bikes, and the binary logit model is adopted to estimate the influence mechanism on their choice of combination. The results of this study show that there is coopetition between the ground transport mode of public bus and the shared bikes, which are a new mode on its own or a mode interfacing with the public transport. The distance that can be covered by bike, the road infrastructure, and the travelers¡¯ psychological factors all suggest a competition between the public bus and shared bikes. On the other hand, the distance between bus transfer stations, and the distance between starting point or destination and the bus station will also influence the mode of cooperation between the two choices. The urban transport administrators should allocate a reasonable number of public buses and shared bikes, encourage downtown travelers to choose different modes of traveling based on their needs in order to quickly connect with the rail transit, advocate the competition among different modes of transport, and promote the cooperation and coordinated development of public bus and shared bikes in the integrated transport system.Key words:

References:

 £Û1£ÝShaheen S A.Mobility and the sharing economy£ÛJ£Ý. Transport Policy, 2016, 51:141142.
£Û2£ÝGreg G, Ipek S.Planning for bike share connectivity to rail transit£ÛJ£Ý. Journal of Public Transportation, 2016, 19(2):1-22.
£Û3£ÝElª²Assi W,Mahmoud M S,Habib K N.Effects of built environment and weather on bike sharing demand: a station level analysis of commercial bike sharing in Toronto£ÛJ£Ý. Transportation, 2017, 44(3):589-613.
£Û4£ÝHu L,Schneider R J.Shifts between automobile, bus, and bicycle commuting in an urban setting £ÛJ£Ý.Journal of Urban Planning & Development, 2014, 141(2):1-16.
£Û5£ÝJ¢|ppinen S, Toivonen T, Salonen M.Modelling the potential effect of shared bicycles on public transport travel times in Greater Helsinki: an open data approach £ÛJ£Ý. Applied Geography, 2013, 43:13-24.
£Û6£ÝNikitas A.Understanding bike sharing acceptability and expected usage patterns in the context of a small city novel to the concept: a story of "Greek Drama"£ÛJ£Ý.Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2018, 56:306-321.
£Û7£ÝMartin E W, Shaheen S A.Evaluating public transit modal shift dynamics in response to bikesharing: a tale of two U.S. cities£ÛJ£Ý.Journal of Transport Geography, 2014, 41:315-324.
£Û8£ÝCampbell K B,Brakewood C.Sharing riders: how bikesharing impacts bus ridership in New York City £ÛJ£Ý.Policy and Practice, 2017,100:264-282
£Û9£ÝSun Y,Mobasheri A,Hu X, et al.Investigating impacts of environmental factors on the cycling behaviour of bicycleª²sharing users£ÛJ£Ý.Sustainability,2017,9(6):1060.
£Û10£ÝRiggs W. Painting the fence: social norms as economic incentives to nonª²automotive travel behaviour£ÛJ£Ý. Travel Behaviour & Society, 2017, 7:26-33.
£Û11£ÝChang A, Mirandaª²Moreno L, Cao J, et al. The effect of BRT implementation and streetscape redesign on physical activity:a case study of Mexico City£ÛJ£Ý.Transportation Research Part A Policy & Practice,2017,100:337-347.
£Û12£ÝBachandª²Marleau J, Lee B H Y, Elª²Geneidy A M.Better understanding of factors influencing likelihood of using shared bicycle systems and frequency of use£ÛJ£Ý. Transportation Research Record:Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2012, 2314:66-71.
£Û13£ÝVedel S E, Jacobsen J B, Skovª²Petersen H.Bicyclists¡¯ preferences for route characteristics and crowding in Copenhagen¡ªa choice experiment study of commuters£ÛJ£Ý. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2017, 100:53-64.
£Û14£ÝHaustein S, Thorhauge M, Cherchi E. Commuters¡¯ attitudes and norms related to travel time and punctuality:a psychographic segmentation to reduce congestion£ÛJ£Ý. Travel Behaviour & Society, 2018, 12:41-50.
£Û15£ÝB¢‰rjesson M, Fung C M, Proost S, et al. Do buses hinder cyclists or is it the other way around?optimal bus fares, bus stops and cycling tolls £ÛJ£Ý.Transportation Research Part A Policy & Practice, 2018,111:326-346.
£Û16£ÝBejarano M, Ceballos L M, Maya J.A userª²centred assessment of a new bicycle sharing system in Medellin £ÛJ£Ý. Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology & Behaviour, 2017, 44:145-158.
£Û17£ÝYe R, Titheridge H.Satisfaction with the commute: The role of travel mode choice, built environment and attitudes£ÛEB/OL£Ý.(2016-06-11)£Û2019-10-08£Ý. http://xueshu.baidu.com/usercenter/paper/show?paperid=3e777e26ee3b02df7ccdf384ba5119fa&site=xueshu_se.
£Û18£ÝZhu J, Fan Y.Commute happiness in Xi¡¯an, China:effects of commute mode, duration, and frequency£ÛJ£Ý. Travel Behaviour & Society, 2018, 11:43-51.
£Û19£ÝNair R,Millerª²Hooks E,Hampshire R C,et al. Largeª²scale vehicle sharing systems: analysis of v¨¦lib¡¯£ÛJ£Ý. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 2013, 7(1):85-106.
£Û20£ÝSaberi M, Ghamami M,Gu Y,et al.Understanding the impacts of a public transit disruption on bicycle sharing mobility patterns:a case of tube strike in London £ÛJ£Ý. Journal of Transport Geography, 2018, 66:154-166.
£Û21£ÝPucher J,Buehler R.Integrating bicycling and public transport in North America£ÛJ£Ý.Journal of Public Transportation, 2009, 12(3)£º79-104.
£Û22£ÝBachandª²Marleau J, Larsen J, Elª²Geneidy A M.Muchª²anticipated marriage of cycling and transit how will it work?£ÛJ£Ý. Transportation Research Record £ºJournal of the Transportation Research Board, 2011£¨1£©:109-117.
£Û23£ÝMartens K. The bicycle as a feedering mode: experiences from three European countries£ÛJ£Ý. Transportation Research Part D£º Transport & Environment,2004,9(4):281-294.
£Û24£ÝYang X H,Cheng Z,Chen G, et al.The impact of a public bicycleª²sharing system on urban public transport networks£ÛJ£Ý.Transportation Research Part A£º Policy & Practice, 2018, 107£º246-256.
£Û25£ÝYang L,Li C,Wang Y.Bikeª²andª²ride behaviour study in economic and technological development zone in Xi¡¯an£ÛJ£Ý.Procedia ª² Social and Behavioural Sciences, 2014, 138:168-173.
£Û26£ÝLotan T.Effects of familiarity on route choice behavior in the presence of information£ÛJ£Ý.Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 1997, 5(3/4):225-243.
£Û27£ÝWatkins K E,Ferris B,Borning A, et al.Where is my bus? impact of mobile realª²time information on the perceived and actual wait time of transit riders£ÛJ£Ý. Transportation Research Part A, 2011, 45(8):840-848.
£Û28£ÝTang Y,Pan H,Fei Y.Research on users¡¯ frequency of ride in Shanghai Minhang bikeª²sharing system£ÛJ£Ý.Transportation Research Procedia, 2017, 25:4983-4991.
£Û29£Ý°¬Èð×Éѯ.2017ÄêÖйú¹²Ïíµ¥³µÐÐÒµÑо¿±¨¸æ£ÛEB/OL£Ý.(2017-03-23) £Û2019-03-09£Ý. http://www.199it.com/archives/574440.html?source=1.
£Û30£ÝKahn M E. Areview of travel by design: the influence of urban form on travel£ÛJ£Ý.Regional Science & Urban Economics, 2004, 32(2):275-277.
£Û31£ÝMunshi T.Built environment and mode choice relationship for commute travel in the city of Rajkot, India£ÛJ£Ý.Transportation Research Part D£ºTransport & Environment, 2016, 44:239-253.
£Û32£ÝKeijer M J N, Rietveld P.How do people get to the railway station? the Dutch experience£ÛJ£Ý.Transportation Planning and Technology, 2000,23:215-235.

Memo

Memo:

-

Common functions

Last Update: 2020-05-25