«Previous Article|Table of Contents|Next Article»

¡¶³¤°²´óѧѧ±¨£¨Éç¿Æ°æ£©¡·[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:

2017Äê03ÆÚ

Page:

85-95

Research Field:

ÐÂÎÅ´«²¥Ñ§

Publishing date:

Info

Title:

Hermeneutics of discourse£ºa multidisciplinary exploration of Elements for constructive communication

Author(s):

Allen Amrollah Hemmat

Department of West Asian, Peking University

Keywords:

discourse analysis;  hermeneutics;  academic discourse;  multidisciplinary discourse;  constructive discourse

PACS:

B516

DOI:

-

Abstract:

Discourse in its broadest meaning encompasses various levels of communication, from interpersonal to international and even dialogue between civilizations. This paper is a search for philosophical and cultural assumptions that can lead to positive and constructive discourse. Poststructuralist approaches to communication have tended to see language either in terms of discourse, constituted by relations of domination, or in terms of a virtually unlimited ambiguity that offers opportunities to resist domination mainly through subversion of meaning. Hermeneutic approaches such as those offered by Gadamer and Habermas, on the other hand, offer paths to mutual understanding, consensus-building, and solidarity. A review of certain theoretical assumptions across various academic disciplines and their practical implications is expected to facilitate the development of a framework for engagement in discourses that are at once critical and constructive.

References:

£Û1£ÝBarker C.Cultural studies theory and practice£ÛM£Ý.London:Sage Publications£¬2000.
£Û2£ÝMichelfelder D P£¬Palmer R E.Dialogue and deconstruction,the Gadamerª²Derrida encounter£ÛM£Ý.New York:State University of New York Press£¬1989.
£Û3£ÝGadamer H G.Truth and method£ÛM£Ý.New York:Continuum£¬2006.
£Û4£ÝEss C. The political computer: democracy, CMS, and Habermas£ÛC£Ý//Ess C.Philosophical perspectives on computer mediated communication.Albany:State University of New York Press,1996£º197-230.
£Û5£ÝFinlayson J G.Habermas£ºa very short introduction£ÛM£Ý.Oxford:Oxford University Press,2005.
£Û6£ÝBahabha H K.The location of culture£ÛM£Ý.New York:Routledge,2004.
£Û7£ÝHuntington S P.The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order£ÛM£Ý.New York£ºSimon and Schuster,1996.
£Û8£ÝBarker C.Cultural studies theory and practice£ÛM£Ý.London:Sage Publications.2000.
£Û9£ÝMiller A I.Insights of genius, imagery and creativity in sciences and art£ÛM£Ý.Cambridge:The MIT Press,2000.
£Û10£Ý¶­ºêÀÖ.¿ÆѧÓïƪµÄÒþÓ÷ÐÔ£ÛM£Ý.ÉϺ££º¸´µ©´óѧ³ö°æÉ磬2005.
£Û11£ÝZohar D.The quantum self human nature and consciousness defined by new physics£ÛM£Ý.New York:Morrrow£¬1989.
£Û12£ÝGardner P.Hermeneutics,history and memory£ÛM£Ý.New York:Routledge£¬2010.
£Û13£ÝBecker A L.Beyond translation essays toward a modern philosophy£ÛM£Ý.Ann Arbor:The University of Michigan Press,2000.
£Û14£ÝBurke K.Permanence and change£ºan anatomy of purpose£ÛM£Ý.Berkeley and Los Angles£ºUniversity of California Press£¬1984.
£Û15£ÝWinters J.Communicative interaction:relating habermasian universalism to Baha¡¯i consultation£ÛD£Ý.Toronto:University of Toronto,1996.
£Û16£ÝMuellerª²Vollmer K.The hermeneutics reader:texts of the German tradition from the Enlightenment to the present£ÛM£Ý.New York:Continuum Publishing£¬1990.
£Û17£ÝJon S G.Towards wave rhetoric for scholarly communication in human sciences£ÛJ£Ý.Advances in the History of Rhetoric,2011,14(2):207-219.

Memo

Memo:

-

Common functions

Last Update: 2017-07-11