|Table of Contents|

Evaluation mechanism of the achievements of humanities and social sciences in colleges under the guidance of quality and innovation(PDF)

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2017年03期
Page:
72-77
Research Field:
经济管理
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Evaluation mechanism of the achievements of humanities and social sciences in colleges under the guidance of quality and innovation
Author(s):
LI Li-juan;  FAN Jian-qiang
1. School of Military Education, Armed Police Engineering University; 2. School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University
Keywords:
humanities and social sciences;  scientific research achievements;  differential evaluation;  academic community;  representative achievements
PACS:
G644
DOI:
-
Abstract:
Due to the influence of management mechanism and external environment, there are lots of problems in the evaluation mechanism of humanities and social sciences in colleges, such as the administerization of academic evaluation, the fuzzification of evaluation criterion, the absence of evaluation subject, the excessive quantification of evaluation method, the anomie of evaluation procedures, the backwardness of evaluation tools, and so on, which need to be improved urgently. The results suggest that at the present stage some principles should be insisted on, such as promoting academic development and prosperity, respecting academic discipline and hierarchical classification, emphasizing peer review, and so on. The evaluation mechanism should be implemented, including cultivating multievaluation subject, taking quality and innovation as the evaluation criterion of, building the index system of hierarchical evaluation, and applying appropriate evaluation method. This paper also put forward the safeguard measures, such as perfecting evaluation system, selecting evaluation subject, improving evaluation technology, and so on.

References:

［1］金太军.论哲学社会科学的评价困境［J］.苏州大学学报：哲学社会科学版,2011，32（2）:14-20.
［2］许海云,方曙.人文社会科学评价中“质”与“量”相结合的评价框架研究［J］.图书情报工作, 2011，55（10）:60-64.
［3］姜春林,魏庆.人文社会科学代表性论文评价指标体系建构及其实现机制［J］.甘肃社会科学,2017（2）:97-106.
［4］袁清,姚威.国外哲学社会科学学术评价制度及其启示［J］.评价与管理,2016（1）:5558.
［5］李慧.高校人文社会科学研究成果评价机制与制度创新［J］.北京信息科技大学学报：自然科学版,2010，25（A1）:13-15，28.
［6］谭春辉.高校人文社会科学研究成果评价监督优化研究［J］.情报资料工作,2013(3):4852.
［7］杨忠泰.高校哲学社会科学科研差异化评价探析［J］.宝鸡文理学院学报：社会科学版，2013，33（2）:107-110.
［8］苏新宁.构建人文社会科学学术期刊评价体系［J］.东岳论丛,2008（1）:35-42.
［9］王志章.关于高等学校哲学社会科学研究评价的思考［J］.西南大学学报：社会科学版，2012，38（1）:5-14，173.
［10］刘明，于小涵.关于哲学社会科学评价制度的意见与建议—基于浙江省的问卷调查［J］.浙江树人大学学报：人文社会科学版,2008，8（1）:82-86，91.
［11］吴建华,谭春辉.人文社会科学研究评价的国际经验研究［J］.情报资料工作,2012（3）:45-50.
［12］谢晶仁.社会科学成果评价的理性透析［J］.社会科学管理与评论,2010（4）:13-18，111.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2017-07-11