|Table of Contents|

Understanding and judicial determinantian on malicious overdraft of credit card(PDF)

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2012年04期
Page:
91-95
Research Field:
法学
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Understanding and judicial determinantian on malicious overdraft of credit card
Author(s):
WEN Li-ying
School of Humanities and Social Science, Xi'an University of Finance and Economics, Xi'an 710061, Shaanxi, China
Keywords:
cardholder;  for the purpose of illegal possession;  two collections;  not returning
PACS:
F830.3
DOI:
-
Abstract:
To accurately identify malicious overdraft of credit card in the judicial practice, the understanding for the purpose of illegal possession, cardholders, and not returning to the credit card were analyzed as the three aspects of the concept of a malicious overdraft.By the analysis, the author thinks that cardholder are not only limited to natural persons and should also include units; knowing the inability to repay should be included for the purpose of being in illegal possession; two collections should be effective collections; and not returning to the credit card should be distinguished.

References:

[1] 刘 涛.《关于办理妨害信用卡管理刑事案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》的理解与适用[J].人民司法,2010(1):27-33.
[2]杨书文.妨害信用卡管理罪的理解与司法认定[J].中国人民公安大学学报:社会科学版,2009(3):102-107.
[3]盛 婧.“恶意透支型”信用卡诈骗罪司法认定中的若干问题[J].法制与社会,2009(7):109-110.
[4]侯 放,柯葛壮.信用证信用卡外汇违法犯罪的防范与处罚[M].北京:中国检察出版社,1999.
[5]刘宪权.金融犯罪刑法学专论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2010.
[6]朱鲁豫,白建军,刘德法,等.恶意透支型信用卡诈骗犯罪如何适用法律[J].人民检察,2011(16):41-46.
[7]刘宪权,庄绪龙.“恶意透支”型信用卡诈骗罪若干问题研究:兼评“两高”《关于办理妨害信用卡管理刑事案件问题的解释》之有关内容[J].当代法学,2011(1):64-71.
[8]孙福瑞.打击信用卡恶意透支要避免伤及无辜[J].金融经济,2010(2):62.
[9]肖晚祥.恶意透支型信用卡诈骗罪认定中的新问题[J].法学,2011(6):49-55.
[10]沈玲芳.恶意透支型信用卡诈骗犯罪相关问题探析[J].法制与经济,2009(14):85-87.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2012-12-20