|Table of Contents|

Controversies in normal science from scientific outlook of Thomas Kuhn(PDF)

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2009年01期
Page:
101-106
Research Field:
哲学
Publishing date:
2009-03-20

Info

Title:
Controversies in normal science from scientific outlook of Thomas Kuhn
Author(s):
GUO Qi-gui1;  GAO Wen-wu2
1. School of Philosophy, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, China; 2. School of Humanities and Sciences, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan 430033, Hubei, China
Keywords:
scientific paradigm;  normal science;  scientific controversy;  science community
PACS:
N09
DOI:
-
Abstract:
In order to deeply grasp the idea of scientific outlook of Thomas Kuhn, the paper, with the help of logic analysis and the historical evidence, analyzes controversies in normal science. The analysis reveals that the scientists, although they do their utmost to resolve puzzles in normal science, have controversies in this stage, and the controversies are not only in the numbers of science community, but also in different paradigm. The paper finds that the roles in normal science stage are different from those of pre-paradigm stage and crisis stage, and it can only bring effect of calcined fright and temper on the criticised paradigm, but cannot lead to scientific revolution.

References:

[1] 伊姆雷·拉卡托斯,艾兰·马斯格雷夫.批判与知识的增长[M].周寄中,译. 北京:华夏出版社,1987.
[2]托马斯·库恩.必要的张力:科学传统和变革论文选[M].范岱年,纪树立,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2004.
[3]托马斯·库恩.科学革命的结构[M].金吾伦,胡新和,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2003.
[4]文剑英.试论科学争论及劳丹对该问题的解决[J].科学技术与辩证法,2006,23(1):47-50,102.
[5]郭贵春.科学争论及其意义[J].自然辩证法通讯,1991,13(3):22-28.
[6]卡尔·波普尔.猜想与反驳:科学知识的增长[M].傅季重,纪树立,周昌忠,等,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2005.
[7]罗宾·柯林武德.自然的观念[M].吴国盛,柯映红,译.北京:华夏出版社,1999.
[8]伊·普里戈津,伊·斯唐热.从混沌到有序:人与自然的新对话[M].曾庆宏,沈小峰,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1987.
[9]李醒民.爱因斯坦[M].北京:商务印书馆,2005.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2009-03-20