|Table of Contents|

A Probe into Case Facts According to Which a Case is Judged —— Also on the Testifying Criteria of Different Lawsuits(PDF)

《长安大学学报（社科版）》[ISSN:1671-6248/CN:61-1391/C]

Issue:
2001年02期
Page:
42-45
Research Field:
法学研究
Publishing date:
2001-12-20

Info

Title:
A Probe into Case Facts According to Which a Case is Judged —— Also on the Testifying Criteria of Different Lawsuits
Author(s):
ZHANG Bao -ya
Department of Law, Xi′an College of Science and Technology, Xi′an,710048, China
Keywords:
procedural law; objective facts; case facts; legal inference; testifying criteria
PACS:
D925
DOI:
-
Abstract:
Seeing that there existing a theory that the“ facts” in the principle of“ Having the facts as basis and the law as criteria” are the“ objective facts” which is abstract and simple practice, here it advances that the“ facts” referred to in“ Having the facts as basis” should be the“ case facts” ,but not the“ objective facts” in philosophical meanig.Meanwhile,considering that the three main lawsuits aim at different targets,the theory which should be diffrent testifying criteria on “ case facts” used in judging cases in different lawsuits was presented.

References:

[1]　王怀安.中国民事诉讼法教程[M].北京:人民法院出 版社,1992.
[2]　祝铭山.中国刑事诉讼法教程[M].北京:人民法院出 版社,1990.
[3]　姜明安.行政诉讼法学[M].北京:北京大学出版社, 1993.
[4]　陈光中.诉讼中的客观真实与法律真实[N].检察日 报,2000,7.
[5]　 DAVID A Bider paul bergrman : Fact Investigation from Hypothesis of Proof.West Publishing CO.1984.
[6]　孙再思.试论中国法律和司法实践中的高度必然性原 则[J].求是学刊,1991,(3).

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2001-12-20